AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Fujita, N.
Right arrow Articles by Nakamura, H.

ARTICLE

Lateral Geniculate Nucleus: Anatomic and Functional Identification by Use of MR Imaging

Norihiko Fujitaa, Hisashi Tanakaa, Mayako Takanashia, Norio Hirabukia, Kazuo Abea, Hideaki Yoshimuraa and Hironobu Nakamuraa

a From the Departments of Radiology (N.F., H.T., N.H., H.Y., H.N.) and Neurology (M.T., K.A.), Osaka University Medical School, Osaka, Japan.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging has the potential capacity for noninvasively depicting the anatomy and function of thalamic nuclei. The purpose of this study was to identify the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN), which is the thalamic relay nucleus for vision, with anatomic and functional MR imaging at 1.5 T.

METHODS: Three-millimeter-thick axial images were obtained from eight volunteers by using a double-echo turbo spin-echo sequence for proton density– and T2-weighted contrast and a spin-echo 3D gradient-echo sequence for T1-weighted contrast. Each participant underwent a visual activation experiment using gradient-echo echo-planar imaging at the same location as that of the anatomic study.

RESULTS: In all cases, the LGN was recognized on proton density–weighted images as a small wedge-shaped area of high signal intensity relative to that of the surrounding white matter tracts. However, it was difficult to identify the LGN on T1- and T2-weighted images because of the smaller contrast-to-noise ratios between the LGN and the adjacent white matter tracts, compared with those of proton density–weighted images (P < .001). Bilateral thalamic activation and activation in the occipital cortex were shown in all participants. Each region of thalamic activation (23 ± 3 mm2) was localized to the anatomically identified LGN.

CONCLUSION: The excellent correspondence between the anatomically and functionally identified LGN confirms that MR imaging is an indispensable method for visualizing functional neuroanatomy in thalamic nuclei.