American Journal of Neuroradiology 23:103-107, January 2002
© 2002 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Radiology Resident Evaluation of Head CT Scan Orders in the Emergency Department
a Department of Radiology, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson
b Department of Surgery, University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson
Address reprint requests to William K. Erly, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Arizona, 1501 N. Campbell Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Prior studies have revealed little difference in residents’ abilities to interpret cranial CT scans. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of radiology residents at different levels of training in the interpretation of emergency head CT images.
METHODS: Radiology residents prospectively interpreted 1324 consecutive head CT scans ordered in the emergency department at the University of Arizona Health Science Center. The residents completed a preliminary interpretation form that included their interpretation and confidence in that interpretation. One of five neuroradiologists with a Certificate of Added Qualification subsequently interpreted the images and classified their assessment of the residents’ interpretations as follows: "agree," "disagree-insignificant," or "disagree-significant." The data were analyzed by using analysis-of-variance or 
2 methods.
RESULTS: Overall, the agreement rate was 91%; the insignificant disagreement rate, 7%; and the significant disagreement rate, 2%. The level of training had a significant (P = .032) effect on the rate of agreement; upper-level residents had higher rates of agreement than those of more junior residents. There were 62 false-negative findings. The most commonly missed findings were fractures (n = 18) and chronic ischemic foci (n = 12). The most common false-positive interpretations involved 10 suspected intracranial hemorrhages and suspected fractures.
CONCLUSION: The level of resident training has a significant effect on the rate of disagreement between the preliminary interpretations of emergency cranial CT scans by residents and the final interpretations by neuroradiologists. Efforts to reduce residents’errors should focus on the identification of fractures and signs of chronic ischemic change.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. E. Meyer, J. P. Nickerson, H. N. Burbank, G. F. Alsofrom, G. J. Linnell, and C. G. Filippi Discrepancy Rates of On-Call Radiology Residents' Interpretations of CT Angiography Studies of the Neck and Circle of Willis Am. J. Roentgenol., August 1, 2009; 193(2): 527 - 532. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. G. Filippi, B. Schneider, H. N. Burbank, G. F. Alsofrom, G. Linnell, and B. Ratkovits Discrepancy Rates of Radiology Resident Interpretations of On-Call Neuroradiology MR Imaging Studies Radiology, December 1, 2008; 249(3): 972 - 979. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. B. Ruchman, J. Jaeger, E. F. Wiggins III, S. Seinfeld, V. Thakral, S. Bolla, and S. Wallach Preliminary Radiology Resident Interpretations Versus Final Attending Radiologist Interpretations and the Impact on Patient Care in a Community Hospital Am. J. Roentgenol., September 1, 2007; 189(3): 523 - 526. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
K. Vydareny and E. S. Amis Jr. Commentary on "Major Changes in Radiology Residency Program Requirements Are Coming" Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 5 - 6. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
W. K. Erly, B. C. Ashdown, R. W. Lucio II, R. F. Carmody, J. F. Seeger, and J. N. Alcala Evaluation of Emergency CT Scans of the Head: Is There a Community Standard? Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2003; 180(6): 1727 - 1730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|