AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Atlas, S. W.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kim, B. S.
Right arrow Articles by Atlas, S. W.

PEDIATRICS

Incidental Findings on Pediatric MR Images of the Brain

Brian S. Kima, Judy Illesa,b, Richard T. Kaplana, Allan Reissc and Scott W. Atlasa

a Department of Radiology, Stanford, CA
b Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Department of Medicine, Stanford, CA
c Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford, CA

Address reprint requests to Judy Illes, PhD, Departments of Medicine and Radiology, Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, 701 Welch Rd, Palo Alto, CA 94304-5748

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have addressed the prevalence of incidental findings in symptomatic and healthy adult populations. Our study aims to elucidate the prevalence of incidental findings in a healthy pediatric population.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 225 conventional brain MR imaging studies obtained during structural and functional brain imaging research in a cohort of neurologically healthy children (l00 boys [44%] and 125 girls [56%]) ranging in age from younger than 1 month to 18 years. All MR images were reviewed, and two board-certified neuroradiologists categorized the findings by consensus.

RESULTS: Incidental abnormalities were detected in 47 subjects (21%), while 79% of the images were normal. Of the 47 abnormalities detected, 17 (36%) required routine clinical referral; a single lesion (2%) required urgent referral. The occurrence of these findings in the male cohort was twice that of the female cohort; however, the percentage of subjects requiring either routine or urgent referral did not differ by sex (male subjects, 34%; female subjects, 39%).

CONCLUSION: Although the frequency of clinically important incidental abnormalities was not high in the sample of children studied, the presence and variety of findings in any pediatric group is particularly important for both the welfare of the subject and for research in which knowledge of the subject’s neurologic status is vital to the interpretation of the results. Despite the limitations of the study in terms of the age and ethnic distribution, this work highlights the need for the routine involvement of trained radiologists in these studies to ensure that such incidental findings are detected and that appropriate follow-up is provided.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.A. Brown and A.N. Hasso
Toward a Uniform Policy for Handling Incidental Findings in Neuroimaging Research
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1425 - 1427.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Law Med EthicsHome page
J. Illes and V. N. Chin
Bridging philosophical and practical implications of incidental findings in brain research.
J. Law Med. Ethics, June 1, 2008; 36(2): 298 - 304.
[PDF]


Home page
JNMHome page
F. W. Floeth, M. Sabel, G. Stoffels, D. Pauleit, K. Hamacher, H.-J. Steiger, and K.-J. Langen
Prognostic Value of 18F-Fluoroethyl-L-Tyrosine PET and MRI in Small Nonspecific Incidental Brain Lesions
J. Nucl. Med., May 1, 2008; 49(5): 730 - 737.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
J. Illes, M. P. Kirschen, E. Edwards, P. Bandettini, M. K. Cho, P. J. Ford, G. H. Glover, J. Kulynych, R. Macklin, D. B. Michael, et al.
Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research
Neurology, January 29, 2008; 70(5): 384 - 390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Child NeurolHome page
J. Schatz, C. B. McClellan, E. S. Puffer, K. Johnson, and C. W. Roberts
Neurodevelopmental Screening in Toddlers and Early Preschoolers With Sickle Cell Disease
J Child Neurol, January 1, 2008; 23(1): 44 - 50.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
NEJMHome page
M. W. Vernooij, M. A. Ikram, H. L. Tanghe, A. J.P.E. Vincent, A. Hofman, G. P. Krestin, W. J. Niessen, M. M.B. Breteler, and A. van der Lugt
Incidental Findings on Brain MRI in the General Population
N. Engl. J. Med., November 1, 2007; 357(18): 1821 - 1828.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
H. H. Alphs, B. S. Schwartz, W. F. Stewart, and D. M. Yousem
Findings on Brain MRI from Research Studies of Occupational Exposure to Known Neurotoxicants
Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2006; 187(4): 1043 - 1047.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
L. E. Betting, S. B. Mory, I. Lopes-Cendes, L. M. Li, M. M. Guerreiro, C.A.M. Guerreiro, and F. Cendes
MRI reveals structural abnormalities in patients with idiopathic generalized epilepsy.
Neurology, September 12, 2006; 67(5): 848 - 852.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Mamourian
Incidental Findings on Research Functional MR Images: Should We Look?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 520 - 522.
[Full Text]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
E. D. Bigler, D. F. Tate, E. S. Neeley, L. J. Wolfson, M. J. Miller, S. A. Rice, H. Cleavinger, C. Anderson, H. Coon, S. Ozonoff, et al.
Temporal Lobe, Autism, and Macrocephaly
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2003; 24(10): 2066 - 2076.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
J. Illes
Neuroethics in a New Era of Neuroimaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1739 - 1741.
[Full Text] [PDF]