AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Crone, K. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jones, B. V.
Right arrow Articles by Crone, K. R.

INTERVENTIONAL

Vein of Galen Aneurysmal Malformation: Diagnosis and Treatment of 13 Children with Extended Clinical Follow-up

Blaise V. Jonesa, William S. Balla, Thomas A. Tomsickb, Justin Millarda and Kerry R. Cronec

a Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH
b Department of Radiology, University Hospital, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH
c Department of Neurosurgery, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH

Address reprint requests to Blaise V. Jones, MD, Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, 3333 Burnet Avenue, Cincinnati, OH 45229

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We herein present our experience in diagnosing and treating 13 children with vein of Galen aneurysmal malformations (VGAM), with an emphasis on possible prognostic indicators, endovascular strategies, factors affecting treatment during the neonatal period, and long-term follow-up. With this review, we hope to identify those factors that have the most significant prognostic value in determining long-term outcomes in children with VGAM.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiology studies, hospital charts, and outpatient clinic chart notes (when applicable) of 13 children evaluated and treated for VGAM at a single tertiary care pediatric hospital. Clinical presentation, diagnostic methods, treatment strategies, and outcome were documented for each child. The present neurologic status and level of function of each patient was determined by review of the outpatient charts and direct contact with the clinicians who were conducting the follow-up. Outcome was graded on a 5-point scale, ranging from 0 (death) to 4 (normal), taking into account only neurologic and developmental characteristics.

RESULTS: Eight of 13 patients presented as neonates with congestive heart failure. The other five patients ranged in age from 4 months to 13 years at the time of presentation. The five patients presenting outside of the neonatal period achieved normal or near-normal outcomes. Two of the eight patients presenting during the neonatal period achieved normal or near-normal outcomes, one experienced significant impairment, and the other five died. We were unable to identify significant differences in outcome on the basis of differences in treatment strategies.

CONCLUSION: Our experience confirms that children with VGAM presenting during the neonatal period have a generally much worse prognosis than do those presenting later in childhood. Complicating factors in the management and treatment of these children are discussed in light of their impact on outcome.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
StrokeHome page
E. S. Roach, M. R. Golomb, R. Adams, J. Biller, S. Daniels, G. deVeber, D. Ferriero, B. V. Jones, F. J. Kirkham, R. M. Scott, et al.
Management of Stroke in Infants and Children: A Scientific Statement From a Special Writing Group of the American Heart Association Stroke Council and the Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young
Stroke, September 1, 2008; 39(9): 2644 - 2691.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch NeurolHome page
J. Kumar, A. Kumar, and S. Gupta
Vein of galen aneurysmal malformation.
Arch Neurol, October 1, 2006; 63(10): 1500 - 1501.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
M. Epelman, A. Daneman, S. I. Blaser, C. Ortiz-Neira, O. Konen, J. Jarrin, and O. M. Navarro
Differential Diagnosis of Intracranial Cystic Lesions at Head US: Correlation with CT and MR Imaging
RadioGraphics, January 1, 2006; 26(1): 173 - 196.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Ultrasound MedHome page
W. Sepulveda, T. Vanderheyden, J. Pather, and L. Pasquini
Vein of Galen Malformation: Prenatal Evaluation With Three-dimensional Power Doppler Angiography
J. Ultrasound Med., December 1, 2003; 22(12): 1395 - 1398.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
H. J. Fullerton, A. R. Aminoff, D. M. Ferriero, N. Gupta, and C. F. Dowd
Neurodevelopmental outcome after endovascular treatment of vein of Galen malformations
Neurology, November 25, 2003; 61(10): 1386 - 1390.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A. Messori, G. Polonara, U. Salvolini, and B. V. Jones
Prenatal Diagnosis of a Vein of Galen Aneurysmal Malformation with Fetal MR Imaging Study
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2003; 24(9): 1923 - 1925.
[Full Text] [PDF]