AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Finelli, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Finelli, D. A.
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.

BRAIN

MR Imaging-Related Heating of Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes: In Vitro Study

Daniel A. Finellia, Ali R. Rezaib, Paul M. Ruggieria, Jean A. Tkacha, John A. Nyenhuisc, Greg Hrdlickad, Ashwini Sharanb, Jorge Gonzalez-Martinezb, Paul H. Stypulkowskid and Frank G. Shellocke

a Division of Radiology, Section of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
b Neuroradiology Section, and the Division of Surgery, Section of Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
c Department of Computer and Electrical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
d Medtronic, Inc., Minneapolis, MN
e Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA

Address reprint requests to Daniel A. Finelli, MD, Section of Neuroradiology/L10, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent work has shown a potential for excessive heating of deep brain stimulation electrodes during MR imaging. This in vitro study investigates the relationship between electrode heating and the specific absorption rate (SAR) of several MR images.

METHODS: In vitro testing was performed by using a 1.5-T MR imaging system and a head transmit-receive coil, with bilateral deep brain stimulation systems positioned in a gel saline-filled phantom, and temperature monitoring with a fluoroptic thermometry system. Standardized fast spin-echo sequences were performed over a range of high, medium, and low SAR values. Several additional, clinically important MR imaging techniques, including 3D magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo imaging, echo-planar imaging, quantitative magnetization transfer imaging, and magnetization transfer-suppressed MR angiography, were also tested by using typical parameters.

RESULTS: A significant, highly linear relationship between SAR and electrode heating was found, with the temperature elevation being approximately 0.9 times the local SAR value. Minor temperature elevations, <1°C, were found with the fast spin-echo, magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient-echo, and echo-planar clinical imaging sequences. The high dB/dt echo-planar imaging sequence had no significant heating independent of SAR considerations. Sequences with magnetization transfer pulses produced temperature elevations in the 1.0 to 2.0°C range, which was less than theoretically predicted for the relatively high SAR values.

CONCLUSION: A potential exists for excessive MR imaging-related heating in patients with deep brain stimulation electrodes; however, the temperature increases are linearly related to SAR values. Clinical imaging sequences that are associated with tolerable temperature elevations in the <=2.0°C range at the electrode tips can be performed safely within an SAR range <2.4 W/kg local (0.9 W/kg whole body averaged).




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
C.H. Vite, S. Magnitsky, D. Aleman, P. O'Donnell, K. Cullen, W. Ding, S. Pickup, J.H. Wolfe, and H. Poptani
Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Reveals Gray and White Matter Disease, and T2 Mapping Detects White Matter Disease in the Brain in Feline Alpha-Mannosidosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2008; 29(2): 308 - 313.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
G. Levin, A. O. Ortiz, and D. S. Katz
Noncardiac Implantable Pacemakers and Stimulators: Current Role and Radiographic Appearance
Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2007; 188(4): 984 - 991.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
M. D. Phillips, K. B. Baker, M. J. Lowe, J. A. Tkach, S. E. Cooper, B. H. Kopell, and A. R. Rezai
Parkinson Disease: Pattern of Functional MR Imaging Activation during Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus--Initial Experience.
Radiology, April 1, 2006; 239(1): 209 - 216.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
F. G. Shellock and J. V. Crues
MR Procedures: Biologic Effects, Safety, and Patient Care
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 635 - 652.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CirculationHome page
A. Roguin, M. M. Zviman, G. R. Meininger, E. R. Rodrigues, T. M. Dickfeld, D. A. Bluemke, A. Lardo, R. D. Berger, H. Calkins, and H. R. Halperin
Modern Pacemaker and Implantable Cardioverter/Defibrillator Systems Can Be Magnetic Resonance Imaging Safe: In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of Safety and Function at 1.5 T
Circulation, August 3, 2004; 110(5): 475 - 482.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Am Coll CardiolHome page
E. T. Martin, J. A. Coman, F. G. Shellock, C. C. Pulling, R. Fair, and K. Jenkins
Magnetic resonance imaging and cardiac pacemaker safety at 1.5-Tesla
J. Am. Coll. Cardiol., April 7, 2004; 43(7): 1315 - 1324.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]