Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Koga, M. Articles by Yamaguchi, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Koga, M. Articles by Yamaguchi, T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 23:568-571, April 2002
© 2002 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Relationship between Findings of Conventional and Contrast-Enhanced Transcranial Color-Coded Real-Time Sonography and Angiography in Patients with Basilar Artery Occlusion

Masatoshi Koga^a, Kazumi Kimura^a, Kazuo Minematsu^a and Takenori Yamaguchi^a

^a From the Cerebrovascular Division, Department of Medicine, National Cardiovascular Center, Osaka, Japan

Address reprint requests to Masatoshi Koga, MD, Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Maidashi 3–1-1, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582 Japan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Contrast-enhanced transcranial color-coded real-time sonography (TCCS) is a promising tool for the evaluation of brain circulation. The purpose of the present study was to assess the diagnostic ability of conventional and contrast-enhanced TCCS in patients with acute stroke and basilar artery occlusion and to compare the findings with those of angiography.

METHODS: We prospectively performed conventional and contrast-enhanced TCCS within 3 days before or after digital subtraction angiography or MR angiography in 62 consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke. We assigned the patients to two groups on the basis of angiographic findings: basilar artery occlusion group (n = 7) and control group without basilar artery occlusion (n = 55). We obtained basilar artery flow images showing the direction of blood flow using TCCS through a suboccipital window.

RESULTS: In the control group, the detection rate of basilar artery flow using conventional and contrast-enhanced TCCS was 76.4% and 98.2%, respectively (P < .001), and the flow direction was antegrade in all patients. In the basilar artery occlusion group, neither conventional nor contrast-enhanced TCCS could obtain flow images of the proximal basilar artery in any patient. In five patients with proximal basilar artery occlusion, a reversed flow image in the distal basilar artery obtained by contrast-enhanced TCCS was confirmed by angiography to be blood supply through collateral circulation from the carotid systems. However, two patients with distal basilar artery occlusion did not have this sign.

CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced TCCS is more sensitive in imaging basilar artery flow than is conventional TCCS. When examined with contrast-enhanced TCCS, a combination of absent basilar artery flow and the reversed basilar artery flow sign may be a diagnostic indicator of basilar artery occlusion.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Tsivgoulis, V. K. Sharma, S. L. Hoover, A. Y. Lao, A. A. Ardelt, M. D. Malkoff, and A. V. Alexandrov Applications and Advantages of Power Motion-Mode Doppler in Acute Posterior Circulation Cerebral Ischemia Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1197 - 1204. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Ribo, Z. Garami, K. Uchino, J. Song, C. A. Molina, and A. V. Alexandrov Detection of Reversed Basilar Flow With Power-Motion Doppler After Acute Occlusion Predicts Favorable Outcome Stroke, January 1, 2004; 35(1): 79 - 82. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. S. Liebeskind Collateral Circulation Stroke, September 1, 2003; 34(9): 2279 - 2284. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]