American Journal of Neuroradiology 23:817-821, May 2002
© 2002 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
MR Imaging of Leptomeningeal Metastases: Comparison of Three Sequences
a From the Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
Address reprint requests to Sanjay K. Singh, MD, Diagnostic Radiology, Box 57, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recent work has shown that fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging with contrast enhancement is highly sensitive for detecting subarachnoid space disease. We hypothesized that contrast-enhanced FLAIR imaging has superior sensitivity to contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR imaging in detecting leptomeningeal metastases.
METHODS: Sixty-eight patients referred for suspected leptomeningeal metastases underwent 74 MR imaging studies. The patients had either temporally related cytologic proof of leptomeningeal metastases or negative results of clinical follow-up confirming absence of leptomeningeal metastases. The MR imaging examinations included unenhanced and contrast-enhanced FLAIR images and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images that were independently reviewed by two neuroradiologists blinded to the results of cytology. Each of the three sequences was reviewed individually and separately and was assigned a score of positive or negative for leptomeningeal metastases. Discrepancies were settled by consensus.
RESULTS: Of the 17 studies of patients with cytology-proven leptomeningeal metastases, two were positive based on unenhanced FLAIR images, seven were positive based on contrast-enhanced FLAIR images, and 10 were positive based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. Of the 57 studies of patients without leptomeningeal metastases, 53 were negative based on unenhanced FLAIR images, 50 were negative based on contrast-enhanced FLAIR images, and 53 were negative based on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images. The sensitivity and specificity of unenhanced FLAIR images for detecting leptomeningeal metastases were 12% (two of 17) and 93% (53 of 57), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for contrast-enhanced FLAIR images for detecting leptomeningeal metastases were 41% (seven of 17) and 88% (50 of 57), respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR images for detecting leptomeningeal metastases were 59% (10 of 17) and 93% (53 of 57), respectively.
CONCLUSION: Contrast-enhanced fast FLAIR sequences are less sensitive than standard contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MR sequences in detecting intracranial neoplastic leptomeningeal disease.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
J.M. Morris and G.M. Miller Increased Signal in the Subarachnoid Space on Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Imaging Associated with the Clearance Dynamics of Gadolinium Chelate: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1964 - 1967. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. L. Stuckey, T. D. Goh, T. Heffernan, and D. Rowan Hyperintensity in the Subarachnoid Space on FLAIR MRI Am. J. Roentgenol., October 1, 2007; 189(4): 913 - 921. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
W. Galassi, W. Phuttharak, J. R. Hesselink, J. F. Healy, R. B. Dietrich, and S. G. Imbesi Intracranial Meningeal Disease: Comparison of Contrast-Enhanced MR Imaging with Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Fat-Suppressed T1-Weighted Sequences AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2005; 26(3): 553 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Mohamed, D. C. Heasely, B. Yagmurlu, and D. M. Yousem Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery MR Imaging and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: Not a Panacea AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2004; 25(4): 545 - 550. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

