Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Saraf-Lavi, E. Articles by Wakhloo, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Saraf-Lavi, E. Articles by Wakhloo, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 23:858-867, May 2002
© 2002 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

Detection of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulae with MR Imaging and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography: Sensitivity, Specificity, and Prediction of Vertebral Level

Efrat Saraf-Lavi^a, Brian C. Bowen^a, Robert M. Quencer^a, Evelyn M.L. Sklar^a, Alan Holz^a, Steve Falcone^a, Richard E. Latchaw^c, Robert Duncan^b and Ajay Wakhloo^a

^a Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
^b Department of Epidemiology & Public Health, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
^c Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

Address reprint requests to Brian C. Bowen, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1115 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33135

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging and contrast-enhanced MR angiography have been used to detect evidence of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulae (AVF); however, the sensitivity and specificity of these techniques have not been shown. The purpose of this study was to establish the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MR imaging alone compared with MR imaging plus MR angiography in determining whether dural AVF are present and to establish the accuracy of MR angiography in predicting fistula level.

METHODS: Twenty patients with surgically proven dural AVF (diagnosed with radiographic digital subtraction angiography) and 11 control patients who had normal digital subtraction angiography findings underwent routine MR imaging plus 3D contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the spine. Images were reviewed in two stages (stage I, MR images only; stage II, MR images plus MR angiograms) by three neuroradiologists who were blinded to the final diagnoses.

RESULTS: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of the three reviewers in detecting the presence of fistulae ranged from 85% to 90%, from 82% to 100%, and from 87% to 90%, respectively, for stage I, compared with values of 80% to 100%, 82%, and 81% to 94%, respectively, for stage II. For each reviewer, there was no significant difference between the values for stages I and II; however, among the reviewers, one of the more experienced neuroradiologists had significantly greater sensitivity than a less experienced neuroradiologist for stage II. On average, the percentage of true positive results for which the correct fistula level was predicted increased from 15% for stage I to 50% for stage II, and the correct level ± one level was predicted in 73% for stage II. MR evidence of increased intradural vascularity was significantly greater in patients with dural AVF.

CONCLUSION: The addition of MR angiography to standard MR imaging of the spine may improve sensitivity in the detection of spinal dural fistulae. The principal benefit of MR angiography is in the improved localization of the vertebral level of the fistula, which potentially expedites the subsequent digital subtraction angiography study.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				W.H. Backes and R.J. Nijenhuis Advances in Spinal Cord MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 619 - 631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S H Wong, M Boggild, T P Enevoldson, and N A Fletcher Myelopathy but normal MRI: where next? Practical Neurology, April 1, 2008; 8(2): 90 - 102. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. C. Bowen and C. L. Truwit MR Angiography versus CT Angiography in the Evaluation of Neurovascular Disease Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 357 - 361. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Ali, T.A. Cashen, T.J. Carroll, E. McComb, M. Muzaffar, A. Shaibani, and M.T. Walker Time-Resolved Spinal MR Angiography: Initial Clinical Experience in the Evaluation of Spinal Arteriovenous Shunts AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2007; 28(9): 1806 - 1810. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Jellema, C. C. Tijssen, and J. v. Gijn Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a congestive myelopathy that initially mimics a peripheral nerve disorder Brain, December 1, 2006; 129(12): 3150 - 3164. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.J. Nijenhuis, M. Mull, J.T. Wilmink, A.K. Thron, and W.H. Backes MR Angiography of the Great Anterior Radiculomedullary Artery (Adamkiewicz Artery) Validated by Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1565 - 1572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P.H. Lai, M.J. Weng, K.W. Lee, and H.B. Pan Multidetector CT angiography in diagnosing type I and type IVA spinal vascular malformations. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 813 - 817. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. H. Luetmer, J. I. Lane, J. R. Gilbertson, M. A. Bernstein, J. Huston III, and J. L. D. Atkinson Preangiographic Evaluation of Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas with Elliptic Centric Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography and Effect on Radiation Dose and Volume of Iodinated Contrast Material AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 711 - 718. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Vilanova, J. Barcelo, J. G. Smirniotopoulos, R. Perez-Andres, M. Villalon, J. Miro, F. Martin, J. Capellades, and P. R. Ros Hemangioma from Head to Toe: MR Imaging with Pathologic Correlation RadioGraphics, March 1, 2004; 24(2): 367 - 385. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]