Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Griffiths, P. D. Articles by Whitby, E. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Griffiths, P. D. Articles by Whitby, E.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:22-27, January 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology

PEDIATRICS

Postmortem MR Imaging of the Fetal and Stillborn Central Nervous System

Paul D. Griffiths^a, Dick Variend^b, Margaret Evans^b, Angharad Jones^a, Iain D. Wilkinson^a, Martyn N. J. Paley^a and Elspeth Whitby^a

^a Section of Academic Radiology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
^b Department of Pathology, Sheffield Children’s Hospital, Sheffield, UK

Address reprint requests to Paul D Griffiths, M.D., Section of Academic Radiology, University of Sheffield, Floor C, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Glossop Rd, Sheffield S10 2JF, UK

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Changes in the public perception of postmortem procedures in the United Kingdom have led to reduced numbers of autopsies being performed in the fetus and neonate. When autopsy is performed in this group, the brain is now usually studied without being formalin-fixed, which limits the available information. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of postmortem MR imaging of the fetal brain and spine when compared with the reference standard, autopsy.

METHODS: We obtained high-spatial-resolution T2-weighted images (in-plane resolution approximately 0.4 mm) of the brain and spine in 40 fetuses and stillborn neonates (14–42 weeks gestational age) who were referred for autopsy. The MR findings were compared with those of autopsy, the reference standard, which had been performed independently.

RESULTS: In eight cases, the autopsy did not provide structural information of the brain or spine, because assessment of the unfixed tissue was impossible. There was agreement between MR and autopsy findings in 31 (97%) of 32 cases in which comparison could be made. Eleven cases showed normal brain, and 20 cases showed a wide range of developmental and acquired abnormalities. The sensitivity of MR was 100%, specificity 92%, positive predictive value 95%, and negative predictive value 100%.

CONCLUSION: MR imaging has a useful role in providing structural information of the central nervous system in fetuses and stillborn neonates.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				T LAVANYA, M COHEN, S V GANDHI, T FARRELL, and E H WHITBY A case of a Dandy-Walker variant: the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach using complementary techniques to obtain accurate diagnostic information Br. J. Radiol., October 1, 2008; 81(970): e242 - e245. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C F Hagmann, N J Robertson, V R Sams, and J A S Brookes Postmortem magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to perinatal autopsy for renal-tract abnormalities Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., May 1, 2007; 92(3): F215 - F219. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Widjaja, E.H. Whitby, M.N.J. Paley, and P.D. Griffiths Normal Fetal Lumbar Spine on Postmortem MR Imaging AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 553 - 559. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. D Griffiths, M. N J Paley, E. Widjaja, C. Taylor, and E. H Whitby In utero magnetic resonance imaging for brain and spinal abnormalities in fetuses BMJ, September 10, 2005; 331(7516): 562 - 565. [Full Text] [PDF]