Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Schmidt, A. M. Articles by Becker, H. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Schmidt, A. M. Articles by Becker, H.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:201-207, February 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Functional MR Imaging of the Auditory Cortex with Electrical Stimulation of the Promontory in 35 Deaf Patients Before Cochlea Implantation

Anja M. Schmidt^a, Benno P. Weber^b, Mehdi Vahid^a, Rene Zacharias^b, Jürgen Neuburger^b, Myriam Witt^a, Thomas Lenarz^b and Hartmut Becker^a

^a Department of Neuroradiology, Medical School Hannover, Germany
^b Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical School Hannover, Germany

Address reprint requests to Anja M Schmidt, Department of Neuroradiology, Carl-Neuberg-Str 1, 30625 Hannover, Germany

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Promontory testing is used for preoperative assessment of the auditory pathway before cochlear implantation. This method depends on patient cooperation and cannot be used in children or disabled persons. Promontory stimulation during functional MR imaging (fMRI) provides a new and objective method to test the integrity of the auditory pathway. To evaluate the method, we performed this prospective study in deaf adult patients.

METHODS: fMRI of the auditory pathway with electrical stimulation of the promontory was performed in 35 profoundly deaf patients, bilaterally in seven. For safe stimulation inside the MR environment, a specially designed nerve stimulator was used. We acquired nine sections parallel to the sylvian fissure by using an echo-planar pulse sequence (1.5 T). To evaluate the number of pixels in the auditory cortex, areas were counted and the minimum confidence level (p_st value) was determined. The auditory pathway was called intact when the minimal p_st value was 10^-5 or when the minimal p_st value was 10^-4 in at least five activated pixels.

RESULTS: Images in 85% of patients reporting an auditory sensation showed activation of the contralateral auditory cortex. In the group of patients reporting no hearing sensation, images in 75% did not show activation.

CONCLUSION: This method can prove the intactness of the auditory pathway and help the surgeon in decision making before cochlear implantation. However, a negative finding should not be interpreted as indicating a nonfunctioning auditory pathway. Additional technical refinements and experience are needed to further improve this method.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. L. Seghier, C. Boex, F. Lazeyras, A. Sigrist, and M. Pelizzone fMRI Evidence for Activation of Multiple Cortical Regions in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Deaf Subjects Users of Multichannel Cochlear Implants Cereb Cortex, January 1, 2005; 15(1): 40 - 48. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]