AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Bulakbasi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Üçöz, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Bulakbasi, N.
Right arrow Articles by Üçöz, T.

BRAIN

Combination of Single-Voxel Proton MR Spectroscopy and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Calculation in the Evaluation of Common Brain Tumors

Nail Bulakbasia, Murat Kocaoglua, Fatih Örsa, Cem Tayfuna and Taner Üçöza

a From the Department of Radiology, Gülhane Military Medical Academy, Ankara, Turkey

Address reprint requests to Nail Bulakba_y I, MD, GATA Radiology Department, Etlik 06018 Ankara/TURKEY; e-mail: nbulak{at}gata.edu.tr

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR spectroscopy and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) calculation have been used frequently for tumor grading and differentiation during the last decade. We evaluated whether the combination of these two techniques can improve the diagnostic effectiveness of MR imaging in patients with brain tumors.

METHODS: Forty-nine patients with histologically proved brain tumors (eight high- and 12 low-grade astrocytomas, eight metastases, eight nonastrocytic gliomas, seven meningiomas, three dysembryoplastic neuroepithelial tumors (DNETs), and three tuberculomas) were prospectively evaluated with contrast material–enhanced MR imaging, single-voxel proton MR spectroscopy (TE = 135 ms), and diffusion-weighted imaging (b = 0, 500, and 1000 s/mm2) before surgery.

RESULTS: MR spectroscopy could differentiate benign from malignant tumors but was not useful in grading malignant tumors. In the differentiation of malignant from benign tumors, N-acetylaspartate (NAA)/choline (Cho), NAA/Cho + creatine (Cr), lactate/Cr, and alanin/Cr ratios (P < .001) were statistically more significant than NAA/Cr and lactate/lipid ratios (P < .05). Increase in lipid/Cr and alanin/Cr ratios could distinguish metastasis and meningiomas from other tumors, respectively (P < .001). DNETs could be diagnosed by their normal spectra and high ADC values (116.25 ± 6.93 x 10-3 mm2/s). Increase in lactate/Cr ratio correlated with degree of malignancy (r = -0.71). ADCs were effective for grading malignant tumors (P < .001) but not for distinguishing different tumor types with the same grade. High-grade malignant tumors (87.16 ± 10.41 x 10-3 mm2/s) had significantly lower ADC values than did low-grade malignant (115.33 ± 11.67 x 10-3 mm2/s) and benign (107.69 ± 8.05 x 10-3 mm2/s) tumors. Peritumoral ADCs were significantly higher in low-grade than in high-grade astrocytomas (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Combination of calculated ADC values from tumoral core and specific relative metabolite ratios acquired by MR spectroscopy added more information to MR imaging in the differentiation and grading of brain tumors and were more useful together than each alone.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
N. Kosaka, T. Tsuchida, H. Uematsu, H. Kimura, H. Okazawa, and H. Itoh
18F-FDG PET of Common Enhancing Malignant Brain Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2008; 190(6): W365 - W369.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H.S. Seo, K.-H. Chang, D.G. Na, B.J. Kwon, and D.H. Lee
High b-Value Diffusion (b = 3000 s/mm2) MR Imaging in Cerebral Gliomas at 3T: Visual and Quantitative Comparisons with b = 1000 s/mm2
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 458 - 463.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
R. N. Al-Okaili, J. Krejza, J. H. Woo, R. L. Wolf, D. M. O'Rourke, K. D. Judy, H. Poptani, and E. R. Melhem
Intraaxial Brain Masses: MR Imaging-based Diagnostic Strategy--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2007; 243(2): 539 - 550.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
M. V. Spampinato, J. K. Smith, L. Kwock, M. Ewend, J. D. Grimme, D. L. A. Camacho, and M. Castillo
Cerebral Blood Volume Measurements and Proton MR Spectroscopy in Grading of Oligodendroglial Tumors
Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2007; 188(1): 204 - 212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
S. Higano, X. Yun, T. Kumabe, M. Watanabe, S. Mugikura, A. Umetsu, A. Sato, T. Yamada, and S. Takahashi
Malignant Astrocytic Tumors: Clinical Importance of Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Prediction of Grade and Prognosis
Radiology, December 1, 2006; 241(3): 839 - 846.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S.J. Price, R. Jena, N.G. Burnet, P.J. Hutchinson, A.F. Dean, A. Pena, J.D. Pickard, T.A. Carpenter, and J.H. Gillard
Improved Delineation of Glioma Margins and Regions of Infiltration with the Use of Diffusion Tensor Imaging: An Image-Guided Biopsy Study.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2006; 27(9): 1969 - 1974.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
P.C. Khanna, S. Godinho, D.P. Patkar, S.A. Pungavkar, and M.A. Lawande
MR Spectroscopy-Aided Differentiation: "Giant" Extra-Axial Tuberculoma Masquerading as Meningioma
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1438 - 1440.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br. J. Radiol.Home page
G G Fan, Q L Deng, Z H Wu, and Q Y Guo
Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion-weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas: a valuable tool to predict tumour grading?
Br. J. Radiol., August 1, 2006; 79(944): 652 - 658.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Provenzale, S. Mukundan, and D. P. Barboriak
Diffusion-weighted and Perfusion MR Imaging for Brain Tumor Characterization and Assessment of Treatment Response.
Radiology, June 1, 2006; 239(3): 632 - 649.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
C.-Y. Chen, C.-W. Li, Y.-T. Kuo, T.-S. Jaw, D.-K. Wu, J.-C. Jao, J.-S. Hsu, and G.-C. Liu
Early Response of Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Transcatheter Arterial Chemoembolization: Choline Levels and MR Diffusion Constants--Initial Experience
Radiology, May 1, 2006; 239(2): 448 - 456.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
P. Weybright, P. C. Sundgren, P. Maly, D. G. Hassan, B. Nan, S. Rohrer, and L. Junck
Differentiation Between Brain Tumor Recurrence and Radiation Injury Using MR Spectroscopy
Am. J. Roentgenol., December 1, 2005; 185(6): 1471 - 1476.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. M. Provenzale, P. McGraw, P. Mhatre, A. C. Guo, and D. Delong
Peritumoral Brain Regions in Gliomas and Meningiomas: Investigation with Isotropic Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging and Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging
Radiology, August 1, 2004; 232(2): 451 - 460.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]