Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Joseph, V. B. Articles by Chacko, A. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Joseph, V. B. Articles by Chacko, A. G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:373-381, March 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology

PEDIATRICS

MR Ventriculography for the Study of CSF Flow

Vivek B. Joseph^a, Lakshminarayan Raghuram^b, Ipeson P. Korah^b and Ari G. Chacko^a

^a Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India
^b Department of Radiodiagnosis, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore, India

Address reprint requests to Ari G. Chacko, MD, MCh Department of Neurological Sciences, Christian Medical College and Hospital, Vellore 632004, Tamil Nadu, India

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Various MR techniques have been used to assess CSF flow and to image the subarachnoid spaces and ventricles. Anecdotal reports describe the use of intrathecal and intraventricular gadolinium-based contrast agents in humans and animals. We sought to determine the clinical usefulness of gadolinium-enhanced MR ventriculography for assessing CSF flow in patients with various neurologic conditions.

METHODS: Five patients (three female and two male patients aged 6 months to 65 years) were included in the study. After performing sagittal, coronal, and axial T1-weighted MR imaging of the brain, 0.02–0.04 mmol of gadodiamide was injected into the lateral ventricle. Sagittal, coronal, and axial T1-weighted imaging was repeated soon after the injection. We were specifically looking for the site of obstruction to CSF flow in those patients with hydrocephalus, communication between cysts and ventricles, elucidation of suspicious intraventricular lesions, and patency of third ventriculostomies.

RESULTS: MR ventriculography showed good delineation of the ventricular system in all patients. In one patient with carcinomatosis and hydrocephalus, a block to contrast material flow was detected at the right foramen of Luschka. In another patient with hydrocephalus, partial block to the flow of contrast material was demonstrated at the right foramen of Monro. In a patient with hydrocephalus and a posterior fossa cyst, flow of contrast material was blocked between the third ventricle and the cyst, with a thin streak of contrast material in the aqueduct. As an assessment of the patency of a third ventriculostomy, MR ventriculography showed flow of contrast material into the suprasellar cisterns from the third ventricle in one patient and absence of flow in another.

CONCLUSION: MR ventriculography is a safe technique for assessing CSF flow, with application in determining the site of obstruction in hydrocephalus, in assessing communication between cysts and the ventricle, and in determining the functioning status of endoscopic third ventriculostomies.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. Kim, N.A. Thacker, P.A. Bromiley, and A. Jackson Prediction of the Jugular Venous Waveform Using a Model of CSF Dynamics AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 983 - 989. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]