American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:436-443, March 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Assessing Tissue Viability with MR Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging
a Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
b Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
Address reprint requests to Pamela W. Schaefer, MD, Department of Radiology, Division of Neuroradiology, Gray B285, Massachusetts General Hospital, Fruit Street, Boston, MA 02114
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Diffusion- (DW) and perfusion-weighted (PW) MR imaging reflect neurophysiologic changes during stroke evolution. We sought to determine parameters that distinguish regions of brain destined for infarction from those that will survive despite hypoperfusion.
METHODS: DW and PW images were obtained in 30 patients at 1–12 hours after symptom onset. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), flow (rCBF), mean transit time (MTT), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), DW image signal intensity, and fractional anisotropy (FA) lesion-contralateral normal region ratios were obtained in the following regions: 1) infarct core with hyperintensity on DW image, abnormality on rCBF and MTT images, and follow-up abnormality; 2) infarcted penumbra with normal DW image, abnormal rCBF and MTT images, and follow-up abnormality; and 3) hypoperfused tissue that remained viable, with normal DW image, abnormal rCBF and MTT images, and normal follow-up.
RESULTS: rCBF ratios for regions 1, 2, and 3 were 0.32 ± 0.11, 0.46 ± 0.13, and 0.58 ± 0.12, respectively, and were significantly different. DW image intensity and ADC ratios were significantly different among all regions, but were more similar than rCBF ratios. rCBV and FA ratios were not significantly different between regions 2 and 3. No MTT ratios were significantly different. No region of interest with an rCBF ratio less than 0.36, an rCBV ratio less than 0.53, an ADC ratio less than 0.85, a DW image intensity ratio greater than 1.23, or an FA ratio greater than 1.10 remained viable. No region of interest with an rCBF ratio greater than 0.79 infarcted.
CONCLUSIONS: Differences among mean ratios of three regions investigated were greatest for the rCBF ratio. The rCBF ratio may be the most useful parameter in differentiating viable tissue that is likely to infarct without intervention, from tissue that will survive despite hypoperfusion. ADC, DW intensity, FA, and rCBV ratios may provide adjunctive information.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  P.G. Kranz and J.D. Eastwood Does Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Represent the Ischemic Core? An Evidence-Based Systematic Review AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2009; 30(6): 1206 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 C. Rosso, N. Hevia-Montiel, S. Deltour, E. Bardinet, D. Dormont, S. Crozier, S. Baillet, and Y. Samson Prediction of Infarct Growth Based on Apparent Diffusion Coefficients: Penumbral Assessment without Intravenous Contrast Material Radiology, January 1, 2009; 250(1): 184 - 192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
J.M. Provenzale, K. Shah, U. Patel, and D.C. McCrory Systematic Review of CT and MR Perfusion Imaging for Assessment of Acute Cerebrovascular Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1476 - 1482. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 H. Ay, E. M. Arsava, W. J. Koroshetz, and A. G. Sorensen Middle Cerebral Artery Infarcts Encompassing the Insula Are More Prone to Growth Stroke, February 1, 2008; 39(2): 373 - 378. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R. L. DeLaPaz and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging Cerebrovascular Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1197 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 O. Wu, S. Christensen, N. Hjort, R. M. Dijkhuizen, T. Kucinski, J. Fiehler, G. Thomalla, J. Rother, and L. Ostergaard Characterizing physiological heterogeneity of infarction risk in acute human ischaemic stroke using MRI Brain, September 1, 2006; 129(9): 2384 - 2393. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
R.G. Gonzalez Imaging-guided acute ischemic stroke therapy: From "time is brain" to "physiology is brain". AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2006; 27(4): 728 - 735. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y.W. Kim, H.J. Kim, B.M. Cho, T.Y. Moon, and C.K. Eun The study of cerebral hemodynamics in the hyperacute stage of fat embolism induced by triolein emulsion. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2006; 27(2): 398 - 401. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.W. Schaefer, L. Roccatagliata, C. Ledezma, B. Hoh, L.H. Schwamm, W. Koroshetz, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev First-Pass Quantitative CT Perfusion Identifies Thresholds for Salvageable Penumbra in Acute Stroke Patients Treated with Intra-arterial Therapy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 20 - 25. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
H. Ay, W. J. Koroshetz, M. Vangel, T. Benner, C. Melinosky, M. Zhu, N. Menezes, C. J. Lopez, and A. G. Sorensen Conversion of Ischemic Brain Tissue Into Infarction Increases With Age Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2632 - 2636. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P.-S. Loh, K. S. Butcher, M. W. Parsons, L. MacGregor, P. M. Desmond, B. M. Tress, and S. M. Davis Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Thresholds Do Not Predict the Response to Acute Stroke Thrombolysis Stroke, December 1, 2005; 36(12): 2626 - 2631. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
T. Kucinski, D. Naumann, R. Knab, V. Schoder, S. Wegener, J. Fiehler, A. Majumder, J. Rother, and H. Zeumer Tissue at Risk Is Overestimated in Perfusion-Weighted Imaging: MR Imaging in Acute Stroke Patients without Vessel Recanalization AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2005; 26(4): 815 - 819. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. H. Danton and W. D. Dietrich The Search for Neuroprotective Strategies in Stroke AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 181 - 194. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
P. A. Hein, C. J. Eskey, J. F. Dunn, and E. B. Hug Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Follow-up of Treated High-Grade Gliomas: Tumor Recurrence versus Radiation Injury AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., February 1, 2004; 25(2): 201 - 209. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|