American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:451-455, March 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Subtraction Helical CT Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vessels
Technical Considerations and Preliminary Experience
a Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow
b Department of Neuroradiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
c Philips Medical Systems, UK
d Robertson Center for Biostatistics, Glasgow, Scotland
Address reprint requests to Dr V. K. Jayakrishnan, Department of Neuroradiology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK, TS4 3BW
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reported CT angiographic (CTA) subtraction methods are not simple, robust, or real time. We investigated a novel technique for semiautomated digital subtraction CTA of the intracranial and extracranial arteries.
METHODS: Thirty patients underwent precontrast (low milliampere-seconds) and postcontrast (pitch, 1.5; collimation, 12.5 mm) helical imaging with a vacuum-type head holder to facilitate image registration and minimize movement. A reconstructed three-dimensional model of the precontrast bone dataset was subtracted from the postcontrast dataset to produce subtracted maximum-intensity-projection angiograms. Experienced (operator 1) and less-experienced (operator 2) staff performed the standard and subtraction reconstructions, and image generation time and quality (graded 15) were compared. A third operator blinded to the method assessed the hard-copy image quality.
RESULTS: Image quality with subtraction postprocessing was significantly better with both operators (operator 1, mean improvement of 0.87 grade, median improvement of 1 grade, P < .001; operator 2, mean improvement of 0.63 grade, median improvement of 1 grade, P < .001). Hard-copy image quality was better with the subtraction method (operator 1, P > .001; operator 2, P < .001). Blood vessels at the base of the brain were better demonstrated on subtraction images in 13 of 14 examinations. For the less experienced operator, the reconstruction time was significantly less with the subtraction method than with the conventional method (mean, 7.5 vs 10.1 minutes; P = .001).
CONCLUSION: When separation of the vasculature from bone is important and technically difficult, digital subtraction CTA offers a potential advantage. This semiautomated technique is fast and easy to learn, and variably experienced staff can use it.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R.C. Wallace, J.P. Karis, S. Partovi, and D. Fiorella Noninvasive Imaging of Treated Cerebral Aneurysms, Part II: CT Angiographic Follow-Up of Surgically Clipped Aneurysms AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1207 - 1212. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.M. Lell, H. Ditt, C. Panknin, J.W. Sayre, S.G. Ruehm, E. Klotz, B.F. Tomandl, and J.P. Villablanca Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1362 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Sakamoto, Y. Kiura, M. Shibukawa, S. Ohba, K. Arita, and K. Kurisu Subtracted 3D CT Angiography for Evaluation of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1332 - 1337. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
B.F. Tomandl, T. Hammen, E. Klotz, H. Ditt, B. Stemper, and M. Lell Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 55 - 59. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. E. Hyde, A. J. Fox, I. Gulka, P. Kalapos, D. H. Lee, D. M. Pelz, and D. W. Holdsworth Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Measurement: Comparison of 3D Computed Rotational Angiography and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2776 - 2781. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
H. W. Venema, G. J. d. Heeten, and V. K. Jayakrishnan Subtraction Helical CT Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vessels: Technical Considerations and Preliminary Experience--Rediscovery of Matched Mask Bone Elimination? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1491 - 1492. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

