AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Jayakrishnan, V. K.
Right arrow Articles by Teasdale, E. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Jayakrishnan, V. K.
Right arrow Articles by Teasdale, E. M.

BRAIN

Subtraction Helical CT Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vessels

Technical Considerations and Preliminary Experience

Vijayam K. Jayakrishnana, Philip M. Whiteb, Douglas Aitkena, Paul Cranec, Alex D. McMahond and Evelyn M. Teasdalea

a Department of Neuroradiology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Glasgow
b Department of Neuroradiology, Western General Hospital, Edinburgh
c Philips Medical Systems, UK
d Robertson Center for Biostatistics, Glasgow, Scotland

Address reprint requests to Dr V. K. Jayakrishnan, Department of Neuroradiology, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK, TS4 3BW

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reported CT angiographic (CTA) subtraction methods are not simple, robust, or real time. We investigated a novel technique for semiautomated digital subtraction CTA of the intracranial and extracranial arteries.

METHODS: Thirty patients underwent precontrast (low milliampere-seconds) and postcontrast (pitch, 1.5; collimation, 1–2.5 mm) helical imaging with a vacuum-type head holder to facilitate image registration and minimize movement. A reconstructed three-dimensional model of the precontrast bone dataset was subtracted from the postcontrast dataset to produce subtracted maximum-intensity-projection angiograms. Experienced (operator 1) and less-experienced (operator 2) staff performed the standard and subtraction reconstructions, and image generation time and quality (graded 1–5) were compared. A third operator blinded to the method assessed the hard-copy image quality.

RESULTS: Image quality with subtraction postprocessing was significantly better with both operators (operator 1, mean improvement of 0.87 grade, median improvement of 1 grade, P < .001; operator 2, mean improvement of 0.63 grade, median improvement of 1 grade, P < .001). Hard-copy image quality was better with the subtraction method (operator 1, P > .001; operator 2, P < .001). Blood vessels at the base of the brain were better demonstrated on subtraction images in 13 of 14 examinations. For the less experienced operator, the reconstruction time was significantly less with the subtraction method than with the conventional method (mean, 7.5 vs 10.1 minutes; P = .001).

CONCLUSION: When separation of the vasculature from bone is important and technically difficult, digital subtraction CTA offers a potential advantage. This semiautomated technique is fast and easy to learn, and variably experienced staff can use it.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R.C. Wallace, J.P. Karis, S. Partovi, and D. Fiorella
Noninvasive Imaging of Treated Cerebral Aneurysms, Part II: CT Angiographic Follow-Up of Surgically Clipped Aneurysms
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1207 - 1212.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
M.M. Lell, H. Ditt, C. Panknin, J.W. Sayre, S.G. Ruehm, E. Klotz, B.F. Tomandl, and J.P. Villablanca
Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1362 - 1368.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
S. Sakamoto, Y. Kiura, M. Shibukawa, S. Ohba, K. Arita, and K. Kurisu
Subtracted 3D CT Angiography for Evaluation of Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1332 - 1337.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
B.F. Tomandl, T. Hammen, E. Klotz, H. Ditt, B. Stemper, and M. Lell
Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography for the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2006; 27(1): 55 - 59.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
StrokeHome page
D. E. Hyde, A. J. Fox, I. Gulka, P. Kalapos, D. H. Lee, D. M. Pelz, and D. W. Holdsworth
Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis Measurement: Comparison of 3D Computed Rotational Angiography and Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography
Stroke, December 1, 2004; 35(12): 2776 - 2781.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
H. W. Venema, G. J. d. Heeten, and V. K. Jayakrishnan
Subtraction Helical CT Angiography of Intra- and Extracranial Vessels: Technical Considerations and Preliminary Experience--Rediscovery of Matched Mask Bone Elimination?
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2003; 24(7): 1491 - 1492.
[Full Text] [PDF]