AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Castriota-Scanderbeg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caltagirone, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Castriota-Scanderbeg, A.
Right arrow Articles by Caltagirone, C.

BRAIN

Coefficient Dav Is More Sensitive Than Fractional Anisotropy in Monitoring Progression of Irreversible Tissue Damage in Focal Nonactive Multiple Sclerosis Lesions

Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbega, Fabrizio Fasanob, Gisela Hagbergb, Ugo Nocentinic, Massimo Filippid and Carlo Caltagironec

a Department of Radiology, Scientific Institute Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome
b the Laboratory of Neuroimaging, Scientific Institute Fondazione S. Lucia, Rome
c the Neurological Rehabilitation Unit, Scientific Institute Fondazione S. Lucia and Università "Tor Vergata," Rome
d the Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Scientific Institute Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy

Address reprint requests to Alessandro Castriota-Scanderbeg, MD, Department of Radiology, Scientific Institute Fondazione S. Lucia, via Ardeatina 306, 00179 Rome, Italy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Persistently hypointense lesions on T1-weighted MR images have been shown to correlate with the amount of axonal damage and clinical disability in multiple sclerosis (MS) patients. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether diffusion coefficient Dav and fractional anisotropy (FA) are able to detect quantifiable differences among three groups of focal nonactive multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions that appear qualitatively different on T1-weighted images.

METHODS: Conventional and diffusion tensor MR images of the brain were obtained in 18 patients with relapsing remitting (n = 10) or secondary progressive (n=8) MS and in 18 healthy volunteers. Focal nonactive MS lesions were classified as T1 isointense, T1 mildly hypointense, and T1 severely hypointense on unenhanced T1-weighted images. Differences among groups were assessed with one-way analysis of variance using the T1 lesion appearance as the grouping factor and either FA or coefficient Dav as the dependent measure.

RESULTS: FA was lowest and coefficient Dav was highest in T1 severely hypointense lesions, and then, in ascending and descending order, respectively, T1 mildly hypointense lesions and T1 isointense lesions. A significant difference in the values of FA was detected only between T1 isointense lesions and T1 severely hypointense lesions (P < .01), whereas no difference was found between T1 mildly hypointense lesions and either one of these two groups. A significant difference was found in the values of coefficient Dav among all investigated lesion groups. Coefficient Dav was found to correlate inversely with the T1-weighted contrast ratio (r=-0.58, P < .0001), whereas FA and {Delta}FA (percentage of FA variation in the lesion, a relative FA measure that minimizes the effect of FA spatial dependence) were not.

CONCLUSION: Coefficient Dav is more sensitive than FA to variations in the degree of T1 hypointensity and, thus, in the amount of the permanent brain tissue damage in patients with MS.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
RadiologyHome page
P. G. P. Nucifora, R. Verma, S.-K. Lee, and E. R. Melhem
Diffusion-Tensor MR Imaging and Tractography: Exploring Brain Microstructure and Connectivity
Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 367 - 384.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F.G. Garaci, V. Colangelo, A. Ludovici, F. Gaudiello, S. Marziali, D. Centonze, L. Boffa, G. Simonetti, and R. Floris
A Diffusion Longitudinal MR Imaging Study in Normal-Appearing White Matter in Untreated Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 475 - 478.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
PediatricsHome page
T. D. Warner, M. Behnke, F. D. Eyler, K. Padgett, C. Leonard, W. Hou, C. W. Garvan, I. M. Schmalfuss, and S. J. Blackband
Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Frontal White Matter and Executive Functioning in Cocaine-Exposed Children
Pediatrics, November 1, 2006; 118(5): 2014 - 2024.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
Y. Ge
Multiple Sclerosis: The Role of MR Imaging
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1165 - 1176.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
NeurologyHome page
M. Rovaris, A. Gass, R. Bammer, S. J. Hickman, O. Ciccarelli, D. H. Miller, and M. Filippi
Diffusion MRI in multiple sclerosis
Neurology, November 22, 2005; 65(10): 1526 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
M Symms, H R Jager, K Schmierer, and T A Yousry
A review of structural magnetic resonance neuroimaging
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, September 1, 2004; 75(9): 1235 - 1244.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]