AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Stafira, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Loftus, C. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Stafira, J. S.
Right arrow Articles by Loftus, C. M.

SPINE

Qualitative Assessment of Cervical Spinal Stenosis: Observer Variability on CT and MR Images

Jeffrey S. Stafiraa, Jagadeesh R. Sonnada, William T. C. Yuha, David R. Huarda, Robin E. Ackera, Dan L. Nguyena, Joan E. Maleyc, Faridali G. Ramjia, Wen-Bin Lia and Christopher M. Loftusb

a Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
b Neurosugery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
c Department of Radiology, the University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City

Address reprint requests to William T. C. Yuh, MD, MSEE, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Everett Tower, Rm 1606, 1200 N. Everett Dr, Oklahoma City, OK 73190

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several studies have been undertaken to validate quantitative methods of evaluating cervical spinal stenosis. This study was performed to assess the degree of interobserver and intraobserver agreement in the qualitative evaluation of cervical spinal stenosis on CT myelograms and MR images.

METHODS: Cervical MR images and CT myelograms of 38 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Six neuroradiologists with various backgrounds and training independently assessed the level, degree, and cause of stenosis on either MR images or CT myelograms. Unknown to the evaluators, 16 of the patients were evaluated twice to determine intraobserver variability.

RESULTS: Interobserver agreement among the radiologists with regard to level, degree, and cause of stenosis on CT myelograms showed {kappa} values of 0.50, 0.26, and 0.32, respectively, and on MR images showed {kappa} values of 0.60, 0.31, and 0.22, respectively. Intraobserver agreement with regard to level, degree, and cause of stenosis on CT myelograms showed mean {kappa} values of 0.69, 0.41, and 0.55, respectively, and on MR images showed mean {kappa} values of 0.80, 0.37, and 0.40, respectively.

CONCLUSION: MR imaging and CT myelographic evaluation of cervical spinal stenosis by using current qualitative methods results in significant variation in image interpretation.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
JCOHome page
N. Reesink-Peters, J. van der Velden, K. A. ten Hoor, H. M. Boezen, E. G.E. de Vries, M. S. Schilthuis, M. J.E. Mourits, H. W. Nijman, J. G. Aalders, H. Hollema, et al.
Preoperative Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Levels in Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer
J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2005; 23(7): 1455 - 1462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
K. Strobel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. Schmid, J. Hodler, N. Boos, and M. Zanetti
Cervical Nerve Root Blocks: Indications and Role of MR Imaging
Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 87 - 92.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]