American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:766-769, April 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology
SPINE
Qualitative Assessment of Cervical Spinal Stenosis: Observer Variability on CT and MR Images
a Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
b Neurosugery, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City
c Department of Radiology, the University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City
Address reprint requests to William T. C. Yuh, MD, MSEE, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Everett Tower, Rm 1606, 1200 N. Everett Dr, Oklahoma City, OK 73190
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Several studies have been undertaken to validate quantitative methods of evaluating cervical spinal stenosis. This study was performed to assess the degree of interobserver and intraobserver agreement in the qualitative evaluation of cervical spinal stenosis on CT myelograms and MR images.
METHODS: Cervical MR images and CT myelograms of 38 patients were evaluated retrospectively. Six neuroradiologists with various backgrounds and training independently assessed the level, degree, and cause of stenosis on either MR images or CT myelograms. Unknown to the evaluators, 16 of the patients were evaluated twice to determine intraobserver variability.
RESULTS: Interobserver agreement among the radiologists with regard to level, degree, and cause of stenosis on CT myelograms showed
values of 0.50, 0.26, and 0.32, respectively, and on MR images showed
values of 0.60, 0.31, and 0.22, respectively. Intraobserver agreement with regard to level, degree, and cause of stenosis on CT myelograms showed mean
values of 0.69, 0.41, and 0.55, respectively, and on MR images showed mean
values of 0.80, 0.37, and 0.40, respectively.
CONCLUSION: MR imaging and CT myelographic evaluation of cervical spinal stenosis by using current qualitative methods results in significant variation in image interpretation.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
N. Reesink-Peters, J. van der Velden, K. A. ten Hoor, H. M. Boezen, E. G.E. de Vries, M. S. Schilthuis, M. J.E. Mourits, H. W. Nijman, J. G. Aalders, H. Hollema, et al. Preoperative Serum Squamous Cell Carcinoma Antigen Levels in Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer J. Clin. Oncol., March 1, 2005; 23(7): 1455 - 1462. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K. Strobel, C. W. A. Pfirrmann, M. Schmid, J. Hodler, N. Boos, and M. Zanetti Cervical Nerve Root Blocks: Indications and Role of MR Imaging Radiology, October 1, 2004; 233(1): 87 - 92. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

