AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Saraf-Lavi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Petito, C. K.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Saraf-Lavi, E.
Right arrow Articles by Petito, C. K.

Case Report
BRAIN

Proton MR Spectroscopy of Gliomatosis Cerebri: Case Report of Elevated Myoinositol with Normal Choline Levels

Efrat Saraf-Lavia, Brian C. Bowena, Pradip M. Pattanya, Evelyn M.L. Sklara, James B. Murdochc and Carol K. Petitob

a Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
b Department of Pathology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL
c Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland OH

Address reprint requests to Brian C. Bowen, MD, PhD, Department of Radiology, University of Miami School of Medicine, 1115 NW 14th Street, Miami, FL 33135

Summary: A 69-year-old woman presented with clinical and imaging findings suspicious for gliomatosis cerebri, later confirmed by biopsy (moderately cellular, infiltrating glioma). Single voxel proton MR spectroscopy (TE 20 and TE 135) and spectroscopic imaging (TE 135) performed at admission showed normal choline, decreased N-acetyl, and elevated myo-inositol levels relative to creatine. The primary conclusion is that in suspected cases of gliomatosis cerebri, myo-inositol/creatine and myo-inositol/N-acetyl should be determined because they may provide evidence of tumor, even though choline/creatine is normal. A corollary to this conclusion is that choline/creatine may be misleading if used to demarcate infiltrating glioma from edema.