AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Hirai, T.
Right arrow Articles by Yamashita, Y.

BRAIN

Clinical Usefulness of Unsubtracted 3D Digital Angiography Compared with Rotational Digital Angiography in the Pretreatment Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms

Toshinori Hiraia, Yukunori Korogic, Kenji Suginoharab, Ken Onoa, Tomohiro Nishia, Shozaburo Uemurab, Masayuki Yamurac and Yasuyuki Yamashitac

a Department of Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center, Kumamato, Japan
b Department of Neurosurgery, Amakusa Medical Center, Kumamato, Japan
c Department of Radiology, Kumamoto University School of Medicine, Japan

Address reprint requests to Toshinori Hirai, Department of Radiology, Amakusa Medical Center, 854–1 Kameba, Hondo, Kumamoto 863-0046 Japan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is useful as a supplement to 2D DSA in the pretreatment evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. However, the clinical efficacy of 3D digital angiography (DA) that is generated from unsubtracted rotational images has not been established. The purpose of this study was to assess whether 3D DA provides additional useful information to that of rotational DA in the preoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS: This prospective study comprised 23 patients (age range, 37–83 years) with ruptured aneurysms who underwent angiography. Two radiologists independently evaluated the rotational DA images and the maximum intensity projection, shaded surface display, and volume-rendering 3D DA images, in combination with 2D DSA images. A four-point scoring system was used to evaluate aneurysm detection and delineation. Referring neurosurgeons were questioned as to whether the information obtained with 3D DA was useful for treatment decisions.

RESULTS: Thirty aneurysms were confirmed by surgery or endovascular treatment. In detection and delineation of the 30 confirmed aneurysms, overall mean scores were highest with volume-rendering 3D DA and lowest with rotational DA. Compared with rotational DA, volume-rendering 3D DA demonstrated 27 additional findings in 14 (47%) of 30 aneurysms: detection of an aneurysm (n = 2), and delineation of aneurysm neck, shape, and relationship to adjacent arteries (n = 25). The information provided by 3D DA was useful for following treatment in five (22%) of 23 patients.

CONCLUSION: In the preoperative evaluation of intracranial aneurysms, 3D DA can provide additional useful information to that of rotational DA.