AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nohara, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nohara, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.

INTERVENTIONAL

Transradial Cerebral Angiography: Technique and Outcomes

Alison M. Noharaa and David F. Kallmesa

a From the Department of Radiology, University of Virginia Health Services, Charlottesville, and the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester

Address reprint requests to Alison M. Nohara, MD, Department of Radiology, Box 800170, University of Virginia Health Services, Charlottesville, VA

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The transradial approach is routinely used for coronary angiography, but only limited data exist regarding transradial cerebral angiography. The purpose of this report was to offer detailed procedural methods for transradial cerebral angiography to facilitate adoption of the technique.

METHODS: We reviewed 60 consecutive cases of transradial access used for neuroangiography and catalogued the indications for angiography, the sheath size, the catheter type, the length of the procedure, the number of cases in which radial artery access was unsuccessful, and the complications. We also noted procedural details regarding adjunctive medications, preprocedural patient assessment, and postprocedural care.

RESULTS: Transradial angiography was successfully applied in 57 of 60 cases (51 diagnostic, six interventional, three failed accesses). Sheaths were used in all cases and ranged in size from 4F to 6F. Mean procedural time for diagnostic cases was 40 minutes ± 19 [SD]. Access-site complications included one forearm hematoma.

CONCLUSION: Transradial angiography is a useful tool for diagnostic and interventional neuroangiographic procedures. All relevant vessels can be accessed from the radial artery for diagnostic studies. Interventions in the right vertebral and carotid systems are facilitated by the transradial approach.