AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. E.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Kallmes, D. F.
Right arrow Articles by Jensen, M. E.

SPINE

Radiation Dose to the Operator during Vertebroplasty: Prospective Comparison of the Use of 1-cc Syringes versus an Injection Device

David F. Kallmesa, Erwin Ob, Soma Sinha Roya, Richard G. Piccoloc, William F. Marxa, Jae K. Leea and Mary E. Jensena

a Department of Radiology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
b Department of Health Evaluation Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA
c Department of Environmental Health and Safety, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA

Address reprint requests to David F. Kallmes, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Percutaneous vertebroplasty procedures require relatively long durations of fluoroscopic guidance, which might lead to substantial radiation dose to operators. Specialized injection devices have been proposed to limit operator exposure. Our purpose was to compare the radiation dose to the operator’s hands during vertebroplasty when using 1-cc syringes versus that when using an injection device.

METHODS: Radiation dosimeters were worn on the left wrist during 39 vertebroplasty injection procedures in 25 patients. Cases were alternated between the use of 1-cc syringes (19 procedures) and the use of an injection device (20 procedures). For each procedure, one dosimeter was worn throughout the procedure, both during needle placement and injection, and a second dosimeter was worn during the injection phase only. Mean doses for the whole case and mean doses for the injection procedure alone were compared between groups.

RESULTS: Mean whole case dose was 128 ± 161 mrem (range, 0–660 mrem) for the 1-cc syringe group versus 98 ± 90 mrem (range, 0–340 mrem) for the injection device group (P = .23). Mean dose during injection was 100 ± 145 mrem (range, 0–660 mrem) for the 1-cc syringe group versus 55 ± 43 mrem (range, 0–130 mrem) for the injection device group (P = .09). Three of 19 1-cc syringe cases yielded zero dose, compared with four of 20 injection device cases. Duration of injection was markedly different between groups, with mean injection times of 4.2 and 7.5 min for 1-cc syringe and injection device cases, respectively (P < .00002). Mean injection dose per minute of lateral fluoroscopy was 23.6 and 7.3 mrem for the 1-cc syringe and injection device groups, respectively (P = .002).

CONCLUSION: The use of an injection device significantly decreased the radiation dose to the operator’s extremity per unit time of injection. However, total dose per injection was equivalent between groups because of significantly longer injection duration for the injection device cohort.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anticancer ResHome page
D. PROSCHEK, A. KURTH, P. PROSCHEK, T. J. VOGL, and M. G. MACK
Prospective Pilot-study of Combined Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation and Application of Bone Cement in Bone Metastases
Anticancer Res, July 1, 2009; 29(7): 2787 - 2792.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadioGraphicsHome page
B. A. Schueler, T. J. Vrieze, H. Bjarnason, and A. W. Stanson
An Investigation of Operator Exposure in Interventional Radiology
RadioGraphics, September 1, 2006; 26(5): 1533 - 1541.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
A.O. Ortiz, V. Natarajan, D.R. Gregorius, and S. Pollack
Significantly Reduced Radiation Exposure to Operators during Kyphoplasty and Vertebroplasty Procedures: Methods and Techniques.
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 989 - 994.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Bone Joint Surg BrHome page
A. G. Hadjipavlou, M. N. Tzermiadianos, P. G. Katonis, and M. Szpalski
Percutaneous vertebroplasty and balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures and osteolytic tumours
J Bone Joint Surg Br, December 1, 2005; 87-B(12): 1595 - 1604.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
RadiologyHome page
J. A. Seibert
Vertebroplasty and Kyphoplasty: Do Fluoroscopy Operators Know about Radiation Dose, and Should They Want to Know?
Radiology, September 1, 2004; 232(3): 633 - 634.
[Full Text] [PDF]