American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:1627-1634, September 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology
HEAD AND NECK
Discrimination of Metastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes with Diffusion-Weighted MR Imaging in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer
a Department of Radiology and Cancer Biology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry
b Departments of Otorhinolaryngology
c Radiology
d Nagasaki University School of Medicine, Japan; and General Electric Yokogawa Medical Systems, Hino, Japan
Address reprint requests to Dr. Takashi Nakamura, Department of Radiology and Cancer Biology, Nagasaki University School of Dentistry, 1–7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki 852-8588, Japan; e-mail: taku{at}net.nagasaki-u.ac.jp
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Metastasis to the regional cervical lymph nodes may be associated with alterations in water diffusivity and microcirculation of the node. We tested whether diffusion-weighted MR imaging could discriminate metastatic nodes.
METHODS: Diffusion-weighted echo-planar and T1- and T2-weighted MR imaging sequences were performed on histologically proved metastatic cervical lymph nodes (25 nodes), benign lymphadenopathy (25 nodes), and nodal lymphomas (five nodes). The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was calculated by using two b factors (500 and 1000 s/mm2).
RESULTS: The ADC was significantly greater in metastatic lymph nodes (0.410 ± 0.105 x 10-3 mm2/s, P < .01) than in benign lymphadenopathy (0.302 ± 0.062 x 10-3 mm2/s). Nodal lymphomas showed even lower levels of the ADC (0.223 ± 0.056 x 10-3 mm2/s). ADC criteria for metastatic nodes (
0.400 x 10-3 mm2/s) yielded a moderate negative predictive value (71%) and high positive predictive value (93%). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated that the criteria of abnormal signal intensity on T1- or T2-weighted images (Az = 0.8437 ± 0.0230) and ADC (Az = 0.8440 ± 0.0538) provided similar levels of diagnostic ability in differentiating metastatic nodes. The ADC from metastatic nodes from highly or moderately differentiated cancers (0.440 ± 0.020 x 10-3 mm2/s, P < .01) was significantly greater than that from poorly differentiated cancers (0.356 ± 0.042 x 10-3 mm2/s).
CONCLUSION: Diffusion-weighted imaging is useful in discriminating metastatic nodes.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. C. Jha, C. S. Whittaker, A. Coady, L. Culver, G. Rustin, M. Padwick, and A. R. Padhani Invited Commentary * Authors' Response RadioGraphics, May 1, 2009; 29(3): 774 - 778. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 V. Vandecaveye, F. De Keyzer, V. Vander Poorten, P. Dirix, E. Verbeken, S. Nuyts, and R. Hermans Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Value of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging for Nodal Staging Radiology, April 1, 2009; 251(1): 134 - 146. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 S. Kim, L. Loevner, H. Quon, E. Sherman, G. Weinstein, A. Kilger, and H. Poptani Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Predicting and Detecting Early Response to Chemoradiation Therapy of Squamous Cell Carcinomas of the Head and Neck Clin. Cancer Res., February 1, 2009; 15(3): 986 - 994. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 Y. Kimura, M. Sumi, N. Sakihama, F. Tanaka, H. Takahashi, and T. Nakamura MR Imaging Criteria for the Prediction of Extranodal Spread of Metastatic Cancer in the Neck AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2008; 29(7): 1355 - 1359. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. Srinivasan, R. Dvorak, K. Perni, S. Rohrer, and S.K. Mukherji Differentiation of Benign and Malignant Pathology in the Head and Neck Using 3T Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Values: Early Experience AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2008; 29(1): 40 - 44. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A. D. King, A. T. Ahuja, D. K. W. Yeung, D. K. Y. Fong, Y. Y. P. Lee, K. I. K. Lei, and G. M. K. Tse Malignant Cervical Lymphadenopathy: Diagnostic Accuracy of Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging Radiology, December 1, 2007; 245(3): 806 - 813. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
A.A.K. A. Razek, A.Y. Kandeel, N. Soliman, H.M. El-shenshawy, Y. Kamel, N. Nada, and A. Denewar Role of Diffusion-Weighted Echo-Planar MR Imaging in Differentiation of Residual or Recurrent Head and Neck Tumors and Posttreatment Changes AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1146 - 1152. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
S. Eida, M. Sumi, N. Sakihama, H. Takahashi, and T. Nakamura Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Mapping of Salivary Gland Tumors: Prediction of the Benignancy and Malignancy AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 116 - 121. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
Y. Kawai, M. Sumi, and T. Nakamura Turbo Short {tau} Inversion Recovery Imaging for Metastatic Node Screening in Patients with Head and Neck Cancer AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1283 - 1287. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 M. Sumi, M. Van Cauteren, and T. Nakamura MR Microimaging of Benign and Malignant Nodes in the Neck. Am. J. Roentgenol., March 1, 2006; 186(3): 749 - 757. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
M. Maeda, H. Kato, H. Sakuma, S. E. Maier, and K. Takeda Usefulness of the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient in Line Scan Diffusion-Weighted Imaging for Distinguishing between Squamous Cell Carcinomas and Malignant Lymphomas of the Head and Neck AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2005; 26(5): 1186 - 1192. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|