Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cottier, J.-P. Articles by Herbreteau, D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cottier, J.-P. Articles by Herbreteau, D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 24:1797-1803, October 2003
© 2003 American Society of Neuroradiology

INTERVENTIONAL

Intracranial Aneurysms Treated with Guglielmi Detachable Coils: Is Contrast Material Necessary in the Follow-up with 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography?

Jean-Philippe Cottier^a, Aurore Bleuzen-Couthon^a, Sophie Gallas^a, Catherine B. Vinikoff-Sonier^a, Philippe Bertrand^a, Florence Domengie^a, Laurent Barantin^a and Denis Herbreteau^a

^a From the Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Bretonneau, Tours, France

Address reprint requests to Jean-Philippe Cottier, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, Hôpital Bretonneau, 2 Boulevard Tonnellé 37044 Tours Cedex 1, France

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Three-dimensional time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography has been evaluated in the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils (GDCs) with good results. Some of the studies used contrast material in addition to the 3D TOF MR technique and others did not. We assessed the usefulness of contrast material with 3D TOF MR angiography by comparing this sequence before and after contrast material injection.

METHODS: Fifty-eight patients harboring a total of 71 cerebral aneurysms previously treated with GDCs were included in the prospective study. MR angiography (at 1.5 T) was performed with a 3D TOF sequence before and after injection of gadolinium-based contrast material. Features evaluated were presence and size of a neck remnant, parent and adjacent vessel patency, and venous overlap. Digital subtraction angiography was the standard of reference.

RESULTS: Comparison of the techniques showed a good agreement in the detection of residual flow. Six cases of small residual neck were not detected with either the 3D TOF or the contrast-enhanced 3D TOF sequence. In one case of giant aneurysm, the extent of recanalization was more evident after contrast material administration. The use of contrast material did not help to show the parent and adjacent arteries. Venous overlap on contrast-enhanced 3D TOF angiograms did not affect image interpretation.

CONCLUSION: In this series, the use of intravenous contrast material did not improve the ability of 3D TOF MR angiography to depict the presence of residual or recurrent aneurysms previously treated with endovascular coiling. In one giant aneurysm, use of intravenous contrast material did result in improved visualization of a residual aneurysm.