Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Gibbs, G. F. Articles by Brown, R. D. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Gibbs, G. F. Articles by Brown, R. D.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 25:84-87, January 2004
© 2004 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Improved Image Quality of Intracranial Aneurysms: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T Time-of-Flight MR Angiography

Gordon F. Gibbs^a, John Huston, III^a, Matt A. Bernstein^a, Stephen J. Riederer^a and Robert D. Brown, Jr.^b

^a Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
^b Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota

Address reprint requests to John Huston III, MD, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We hypothesize that the nearly doubling of signal-to-noise ratio at 3.0 T compared with that at 1.5 T yields improved clinical MR angiograms and enables superior visualization of intracranial aneurysms. The goal of this study was to determine whether 3.0-T time-of-flight (TOF) MR angiography is superior to 1.5-T TOF MR angiography in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS: Fifty consecutive patients referred for MR angiography of a known or suspected intracranial aneurysm underwent 3-T TOF MR angiography. Seventeen of these 50 patients had also previously undergone 1.5-T TOF MR angiography and these images were used as a basis for comparison with images obtained at 3.0 T. Fourteen of 23 patients in whom aneurysms were identified also underwent prior conventional angiography, which was used as the reference standard. Readers blinded to patient history identified the presence and location of aneurysm(s) on angiograms and graded images for overall image quality by using a five-point scale.

RESULTS: Twenty-eight aneurysms were identified in 23 of 50 patients. Seventeen aneurysms in 17 patients had been documented with 1.5-T MR angiography. The 3.0-T technique had a higher mean image quality score than that of the 1.5-T MR technique (P < .0001). Both 3.0-T and 1.5-T TOF MR angiography depicted all the aneurysms that had been documented by conventional angiography.

CONCLUSION: 3D TOF MR angiography at 3 T offers superior depiction of intracranial aneurysms compared with that of 1.5-T TOF MR angiography.