Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pillai, J. J. Articles by Lavin, T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pillai, J. J. Articles by Lavin, T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 25:523-532, April 2004
© 2004 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Functional MR Imaging Study of Language-Related Differences in Bilingual Cerebellar Activation

Jay J. Pillai^a, Jerry D. Allison^a, Sankar Sethuraman^c, Julio M. Araque^a, Dharma Thiruvaiyaru^c, Claro B. Ison^a, David W. Loring^b and Thomas Lavin^a

^a Department of Radiology, the Medical College of Georgia
^b Department of Neurology, the Medical College of Georgia
^c Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Augusta State University, GA

Address reprint requests to Jay J. Pillai, MD, Department of Radiology, Neuroradiology Division, Medical College of Georgia, 1120 15th Street, Augusta, GA 30912

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Reports in the monolingual literature suggest that the cerebellum has an important role in language processing. The purpose of this study was to determine whether bilingual cerebellar functional MR imaging (fMRI) activation differs during the performance of comparable tasks in subjects’ primary and secondary languages.

METHODS: Eight bilingual, right-handed individuals underwent echo-planar fMRI at 1.5 T. They performed semantic (noun-verb association) and phonological (rhyming) tasks in Spanish (primary language) and English (secondary language). Individual and group functional datasets were analyzed using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM99; P < .001 with a 10-voxel spatial extent threshold) and overlaid on T1-weighted anatomic images normalized to a standard (Montreal Neurologic Institute) space. Analysis of variance was performed on laterality indices derived from voxel counts in cerebellar regions of interest (ROIs). Subtraction of group-averaged normalized results from the combined Spanish tasks from the combined English tasks was also performed within SPM99 (P < .001 activation threshold).

RESULTS: Significantly greater lateralilty indices were noted in the English tasks than in the Spanish tasks (mean Spanish LI, 0.3286; mean English LI, 0.5141 [P = .0143]). Overall, more robust activation was seen in the English tasks than in the Spanish tasks. Areas of significantly greater activation existed in the English tasks as compared with the Spanish tasks; these areas were more prominent in the left cerebellar hemisphere.

CONCLUSION: Although both English and Spanish language tasks demonstrate left cerebellar dominance, English tasks demonstrate greater left hemispheric lateralization.