AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rüfenacht, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Tanaka, N.
Right arrow Articles by Rüfenacht, D. A.

INTERVENTIONAL

Conformity of Carotid Stents with Vascular Anatomy: Evaluation in Carotid Models

Norimitsu Tanakaa, Jean-Baptiste Martinb, Koji Tokunagab, Toshi Abea, Yusuke Uchiyamaa, Naofumi Hayabuchia, Joachim Berkefeldc and Daniel A. Rüfenachta

a Department of Radiology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan
b Section of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospital of Geneva, Switzerland
c Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital of Frankfurt, Germany

Address reprint requests to Norimitsu Tanaka, MD, Department of Radiology, Kurume University, School of Medicine, 67 Asahi-machi Kurume City, Fukuoka Prefecture, 830-0011, Japan

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Conformity between self-expanding Wallstents and vascular anatomy is limited. Because of a lack of longitudinal flexibility, straightening effects on vascular curves occur and may result in stent-induced kinking. Our purpose was to evaluate the conformity of self-expanding stents with the course and endoluminal surface of silicone models of the normal human carotid artery.

METHODS: Five different types of self-expanding carotid stents were implanted into simplified pulsatile perfused silicone models of the carotid bifurcation. The models embody elastic properties of the vessel wall similar to those of normal human arteries. All stents had the same nominal diameter and length and bridged the external carotid artery origin as well as a consecutive curve at the initial segment of the internal carotid artery. Conventional radiographs of the model were compared before and after stent placement to record changes of shape and course of the silicone artery. Dehiscences between stent filaments and arterial wall were measured on digital subtraction angiograms of the model.

RESULTS: Implantation of braided Wallstents or the Expander with continuous filaments induced considerable straightening effects on the bifurcation angle, as well as on the curves of the internal carotid artery. Segmented designs of modular nitinol stents complied better with vascular tortuosity and showed improved adaption between stent and the endoluminal surface of the model.

CONCLUSION: Model experiments show that segmented nitinol stents improve the conformity between the prosthesis and vascular anatomy, and confirm new carotid stent concepts as an alternative to the Wallstent.