Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, C.-J. Articles by See, L.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, C.-J. Articles by See, L.-C.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 25:769-774, May 2004
© 2004 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Multisection CT Angiography Compared with Catheter Angiography in Diagnosing Vertebral Artery Dissection

Chi-Jen Chen^a, Ying-Chi Tseng^a, Tsong-Hai Lee^b, Hui-Ling Hsu^a and Lai-Chu See^c

^a Department of Diagnostic Radiology, E-Da Hospital/I-Shou University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
^b Department of Neurology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC
^c Public Health and Biostatistics Center, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan, ROC

Address reprint requests to Chi-Jen Chen, MD, Departments of Diagnostic Radiology, E-Da Hospital/1-Shou University, 1, Yi-Da Road, Jiau-Shu Tsuen, Yan-Chau Shiang, Kaohsiung County, Taiwan, 824, ROC

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multisection CT angiography is a minimally invasive technique that can provide high-resolution and high-contrast images of the arterial lumen and wall. To our knowledge, the ability of multisection CT angiography in detecting vertebral artery (VA) dissection has never been evaluated. We assessed the sensitivity and specificity of a routine, standardized, multisection CT angiographic protocol for the detection of VA dissection.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed multisection CT angiograms of 17 patients with VA dissection and 17 control subjects. The acquisition protocol for multisection CT angiography was 1.25-mm nominal section thickness, a table speed of 7.5 mm per rotation (9.4 mm/s), and a 0.8-second gantry rotation period. Two radiologists assessed the maximum intensity projection and axial source images. The sensitivity and specificity of this technique in depicting VA dissection were determined.

RESULTS: Conventional angiography depicted 15 normal and 19 dissected VAs (including five stenotic, seven occlusive, and seven aneurysmal dissections) in the patient group and 28 normal and six atherosclerotic VAs in the control group. Multisection CT angiography enabled successful diagnosis of all 19 dissected VAs and 48 (98%) of 49 nondissected VAs but misidentified a severe atherosclerotic lesion as an aneurysmal-type dissection. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and positive and negative predictive values of multisection CT angiography in diagnosing VA dissection were 100%, 98%, 98.5%, 95%, and 100%, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Multisection CT angiography was a sensitive and accurate technique for the diagnosis of VA dissection.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. L. Truwit and B. C. Bowen CT Angiography versus MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Acute Neurovascular Disease Radiology, November 1, 2007; 245(2): 362 - 366. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. Mutze, G. Rademacher, G. Matthes, N. Hosten, and D. Stengel Blunt Cerebrovascular Injury in Patients with Blunt Multiple Trauma: Diagnostic Accuracy of Duplex Doppler US and Early CT Angiography Radiology, December 1, 2005; 237(3): 884 - 892. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tola, M. Yurdakul, and T. Cumhur B-Flow Imaging in Low Cervical Internal Carotid Artery Dissection J. Ultrasound Med., November 1, 2005; 24(11): 1497 - 1502. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]