American Journal of Neuroradiology 25:897-900, May 2004
© 2004 American Society of Neuroradiology
SOCIOECONOMIC
Assessment of the Neuroradiology Fellowship Match: Year 3
a From the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Division of Neuroradiology, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, Baltimore
Address reprint requests to David M. Yousem, the Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, the Johns Hopkins Medical Institution, 600 N. Wolfe Street/Phipps B-112, Baltimore, MD 21287
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: When the fellowship match for trainees entering neuroradiology programs was first proposed in 2001, the program directors in neuroradiology agreed to a 3-year trial utilizing the National Residency Match Program (NRMP) for selecting fellows. A decision as to whether to continue with the neuroradiology fellowship match was to be assessed at the 3-year mark in 2004.
METHODS: A Web survey designed through the offices of the ASNR was distributed to neuroradiology fellowship program directors after the results of the most recent fellowship match were tabulated in June 2003. The questionnaire included items about the current sentiment about the fellowship selection process.
RESULTS: Most (52 of 61 = 85%) neuroradiology program directors favored continuing the match system for selecting fellows. Most believed that the match 1) had little impact on their success in recruiting fellows (43 of 62 = 69%), 2) was fairly administered (100%), and 3) was appropriately timed from February to June in the third year of residency (56 of 65 = 86%). The number of candidates entering the neuroradiology match increased from 71 in 2001 to 124 in 2003.
CONCLUSION: Support for continuing a match system for selecting fellows remains high (85%) among neuroradiology program directors. The system is considered fair and does not harm many programs. The recruitment of fellows to neuroradiology via the match has increased over the 3 years of its existence.