American Journal of Neuroradiology 25:1092-1098, June-July 2004
© 2004 American Society of Neuroradiology
HEAD AND NECK
Intraobserver Variability in the MR Determination of Tumor Volume in Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pharynx
a Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia
b Department of Otorhinolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia
c Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia
d the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, Philadelphia
Address reprints requests to Laurie A. Loevner, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Pennsylvania Medical Center, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: If tumor volumes are to be used for evaluating responses to treatment and long-term outcomes of patients with primary pharyngeal carcinomas, the reproducibility of these measurements must be established. We determined the intraobserver variability of MR imagingbased volume measurements of these cancers and their regional metastases.
METHODS: We used an interactive computer program (IDL) that enables the extraction of tumor volumes from 3D MR data to obtain 202 volume measurements in 17 patients with pharyngeal carcinoma (two to five time points each). The primary cancer and largest nodal mass were manually outlined on every T2-weighted image of each MR study. The same neuroradiologist reanalyzed this MR dataset 241 weeks later. Measurement error and percentage measurement error (intraobserver variability) were determined. Differences in intraobserver variability between primary lesions and nodes, as well as between stages of treatment were tested with a Wilcoxon rank sum test.
RESULTS: The mean and median percentage measurement errors, respectively, were 13% and 12% (range, 053%; 95% CI: 10%, 16%) for primary tumors and 9% and 7% (range, 037%; 95% CI: 7%, 12%) for nodal metastases. The difference in the percentage measurement error between primary lesions and cervical nodes approached statistical significance (P = .07). Differences in the variation of volume measurements based on the stage of therapy were significant (P = .01).
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that MR imagingbased tumor volumes are reliably reproducible. Such measurements may be important in predicting patient outcome, determining appropriate therapy, and conducting patient follow-up.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
E. Mehrara, E. Forssell-Aronsson, H. Ahlman, and P. Bernhardt Specific Growth Rate versus Doubling Time for Quantitative Characterization of Tumor Growth Rate Cancer Res., April 15, 2007; 67(8): 3970 - 3975. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Kimura, M. Sumi, Y. Ichikawa, Y. Kawai, and T. Nakamura Volumetric MR Imaging of Oral, Maxillary Sinus, Oropharyngeal, and Hypopharyngeal Cancers: Correlation between Tumor Volume and Lymph Node Metastasis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2005; 26(9): 2384 - 2389. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

