Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Hathout, G. M. Articles by Grant, E. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Hathout, G. M. Articles by Grant, E. G.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:68-75, January 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD AND NECK

Sonographic NASCET Index: A New Doppler Parameter for Assessment of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis

Gasser M. Hathout^a,b, James R. Fink^a, Suzie M. El-Saden^a,b and Edward G. Grant^c

^a Department of Radiology, University of California at Los Angeles
^b Department of Radiology, West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center
^c Department of Radiology, University of Southern California Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA

Address reprint requests to Gasser M. Hathout, M.D., Department of Radiology, West Los Angeles Veterans Administration Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90073

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Established Doppler parameters for carotid stenosis assessment do not reflect North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)-style methodology. We derived a Doppler parameter, termed sonographic NASCET index (SNI), and hypothesized that the SNI would provide greater angiographic correlation and better accuracy in predicting stenosis of 70% or greater than that of currently used peak systolic velocity (PSV) measurements.

METHODS: Inclusion criteria of angiographically proved carotid stenoses of 40–95% and measured proximal and distal internal carotid artery Doppler PSV values were established. Occlusions and near occlusions were specifically excluded. Doppler and angiographic data meeting the inclusion criteria from 32 carotid bifurcations were identified; actual angiographic stenoses ranged 40–89%. SNI values were calculated for each vessel. PSV and SNI were correlated with angiography by using linear regression analysis. Accuracies of SNI and PSV in predicting stenosis of 70% or greater were compared at two thresholds.

RESULTS: Correlation between SNI and angiography was superior to that between PSV and angiography (r² = 0.64 vs 0.38). PSV and SNI values that corresponded to 70% angiographic stenosis were 345 cm/s and 45.5, respectively. Accuracy of PSV of 345 cm/s or greater in predicting stenosis of 70% or greater was 78%, compared with 88% for SNI of 45.5 or greater. The SNI value that corresponded to a PSV threshold of 250 cm/s was 33. Accuracy of PSV of 250 cm/s or greater in predicting stenosis of 70% or greater was 81%, compared with 88% for SNI of 33 or greater.

CONCLUSION: Correlation between SNI and angiography was greater than that between PSV and angiography. Accuracy of SNI in predicting stenosis of 70% or greater was also superior to that of PSV at two thresholds. These results suggest that SNI may be a better predictor of high-grade carotid stenosis than is PSV.