AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Koenigsberg, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzales, C.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Koenigsberg, R. A.
Right arrow Articles by Gonzales, C.

HEAD AND NECK

Evaluation of Platybasia with MR Imaging

Robert A. Koenigsberga,b, Nakul Vakila,b, Tom A. Honga,b, Tun Htaikb, Eric Faerberc, Tina Maioranoa,b, Monica Duaa,b, Scott Farob and Carlos Gonzalesb

a Department of Radiologic Sciences, Drexel University College of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
b Department of Neuroradiology, Hahnemann University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
c St. Christopher’s Hospital for Children, Philadelphia, PA

Address reprint requests to Robert Koenigsberg DO, FAOCR, Drexel University College of Medicine, Department of Radiologic Sciences, Mail Stop 206, 245 N. 15th Street, Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Platybasia, or abnormal obtuseness of the basal angle, was first measured on plain skull images. At present, evaluation of the brain and skull more commonly involves CT and MR imaging. We evaluated a new MR imaging method of evaluating platybasia.

METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated midline sagittal MR images in 200 adults and 50 children. The basal angle of the skull base was measured by using two methods: The standard MR imaging technique measured the angle formed by two lines—one joining the nasion and the center of the pituitary fossa connected by a line joining the anterior border of the foramen magnum and center of the pituitary fossa. The modified technique measured the angle formed by a line across the anterior cranial fossa and dorsum sellae connecting a line along the clivus.

RESULTS: With the standard MR imaging technique, we obtained mean angles of 129° ± 6° for adults and 127° ± 5° for children, compared with 135.3° (composite mean) in previous series. The modified technique produced values of 117° ± 6° for adults and 114° ± 5° for children, which were significantly lower that those of standard MR imaging and traditional radiography (P < .05).

CONCLUSION: Both the standard and modified MR imaging techniques produced basal angles lower than those previously reported with standard radiography. The modified technique uses clearly featured landmarks that can be reproduced consistently on midline sagittal T1 images. This technique and its corresponding values can be used as the new standard for evaluating the basal angle.