Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Tomaszewki Farias, S. Articles by Seyal, M. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Tomaszewki Farias, S. Articles by Seyal, M.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:2492-2499, November-December 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Differences in Functional MR Imaging Activation Patterns Associated with Confrontation Naming and Responsive Naming

Sarah Tomaszewki Farias^a, Gregory Harrington^b, Catherine Broomand^a and Maysud Seyal^a

^a Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA
^b Department of Radiology, University of California, Davis, Sacramento, CA

Address correspondence to Sarah Tomaszewski Farias, PhD, Department of Neurology, University of California, Davis, 4860 Y Street, Suite 3700, Sacramento, CA 95817

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Direct cortical stimulation studies suggest that responsive naming is more widely distributed within the temporal lobe than confrontation naming and involves anterior temporal regions typically resected in a standard temporal lobectomy. The aim of the current study was to further demonstrate the anatomic dissociation between confrontation and responsive naming by using functional MR imaging (fMRI).

METHODS: Twenty participants underwent fMRI while performing either a confrontation or responsive naming task. Regions of interest were identified within the anterior and posterior temporal lobe.

RESULTS: Responsive naming produced more activation than confrontation naming within the dominant temporal lobe, with activation extending into the temporal pole. Activation in the dominant temporal lobe associated with responsive naming was observed in the superior, middle, and inferior temporal gyri but was limited to the middle temporal gyrus for confrontation naming. Although both naming tasks produced activation within the posterior temporal region of interest in all participants, responsive and confrontation naming produced activation within the anterior temporal region of interest in 90% versus 60% of the sample, respectively. Areas of the dominant hemisphere activated by both tasks included parts of the middle occipital and middle temporal gyri, inferior frontal lobe, and hippocampus, among others.

CONCLUSION: Findings are consistent with cortical stimulation studies and suggest that responsive naming produces more widespread activation within the temporal lobe compared with confrontation naming. The activation more often included anterior temporal regions during responsive naming as compared with confrontation naming. In clinical cases where the functional assessment of the temporal lobe—particularly the anterior regions—is important, the current results suggest responsive naming should be a useful fMRI paradigm and may ultimately help predict the risk of postsurgical language changes.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				N. Sanai, Z. Mirzadeh, and M. S. Berger Functional Outcome after Language Mapping for Glioma Resection N. Engl. J. Med., January 3, 2008; 358(1): 18 - 27. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. J. Hamberger, W. T. Seidel, R. R. Goodman, A. Williams, K. Perrine, O. Devinsky, and G. M. McKhann II Evidence for cortical reorganization of language in patients with hippocampal sclerosis Brain, November 1, 2007; 130(11): 2942 - 2950. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. DeLeon, R. F. Gottesman, J. T. Kleinman, M. Newhart, C. Davis, J. Heidler-Gary, A. Lee, and A. E. Hillis Neural regions essential for distinct cognitive processes underlying picture naming Brain, May 1, 2007; 130(5): 1408 - 1422. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]