Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Slivka, A. P. Articles by Notestine, M. A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Slivka, A. P. Articles by Notestine, M. A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:242-245, February 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Clinical and Imaging Outcomes after Stroke with Normal Angiograms

Andrew P. Slivka^a, Greg A. Christoforidis^b, Eric C. Bourekas^b, Philip E. Calendine^b and Margaret A. Notestine^a

^a Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus
^b Department of Radiology, Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus

Address reprint requests to Andrew Slivka, MD, Department of Neurology, Ohio State University Medical Center, 1654 Upham Drive, Columbus, OH 43210

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Information about the prognosis of patients with acute ischemic stroke and normal angiography is limited. We report clinical and imaging outcomes of patients seen within 6 hours of symptom onset who were considered candidates for thrombolysis.

METHODS: Between November 1994 and December 1999, patients with stroke onset of less than 6 hours who were thrombolytic candidates underwent cerebral angiography. Patients with normal angiograms (defined as no sign of occlusive disease in the head or neck in the symptomatic artery) were included. Admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores and discharge modified Rankin scores (mRS) were obtained. CT or MR images were obtained 24 hours or longer after symptom onset. Good outcome was defined as an mRS score 2. For analysis, follow-up CT or MR imaging findings were classified as showing cortical infarct, subcortical infarct 1.5 cm, subcortical infarct 1.5 cm, or no new infarct. The mechanism of the normal angiogram was assumed on the basis of these results.

RESULTS: Twenty-one patients with stroke had normal angiograms. About 43% (9/21) of the patients had a favorable hospital discharge clinical outcome, and an additional 33% (7/21) had favorable clinical outcomes at subsequent follow-up. New infarct on follow-up imaging was seen in 71% (15/21). Discharge mRS scores were not correlated with admission NIHSS scores or the mechanism of the normal angiogram.

CONCLUSION: Approximately 76% of acute stroke patients with normal angiograms have a favorable clinical outcome, and 71% have associated new infarctions. Given these outcomes, further study is needed before recommendations regarding thrombolytic treatment can be made in this population.