AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wakhloo, A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Shellock, F. G.
Right arrow Articles by Wakhloo, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:363-366, February 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

Technical Note
BRAIN

Detachable Coil for Cerebral Aneurysms: In Vitro Evaluation of Magnetic Field Interactions, Heating, and Artifacts at 3T

Frank G. Shellocka, Matthew Gounisb and Ajay Wakhlooc

a Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California and Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research, Los Angeles, CA
b Department of Radiology and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL
c Department of Radiology, Department of Surgery, and Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Miami, Miami, FL

Address reprint requests to Frank G. Shellock, Ph.D., Institute for Magnetic Resonance Safety, Education, and Research, 7511 McConnell Ave., Suite 100, Los Angeles, CA 90045, frank.shellock{at}gte.net, www.MRIsafety.com

Summary: A detachable coil was assessed for magnetic field interactions, heating (body RF coil, SAR of 2.0-W/kg), and artifacts at 3-Tesla. The coil showed no magnetic field interactions and heating was negligible (+0.3°C). Therefore, this coil is safe for a patient undergoing MR imaging at 3T or less. While artifacts may impair the ability to properly visualize anatomy in proximity to this implant, careful selection of imaging parameters can mitigate this problem.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 CirculationHome page
G. N. Levine, A. S. Gomes, A. E. Arai, D. A. Bluemke, S. D. Flamm, E. Kanal, W. J. Manning, E. T. Martin, J. M. Smith, N. Wilke, et al.
Safety of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Patients With Cardiovascular Devices: An American Heart Association Scientific Statement From the Committee on Diagnostic and Interventional Cardiac Catheterization, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention: Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology Foundation, the North American Society for Cardiac Imaging, and the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance
Circulation, December 11, 2007; 116(24): 2878 - 2891.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
E. M. Merkle and B. M. Dale
Abdominal MRI at 3.0 T: the basics revisited.
Am. J. Roentgenol., June 1, 2006; 186(6): 1524 - 1532.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Home page
 Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
F.G. Shellock, R. Habibi, and J. Knebel
Programmable CSF Shunt Valve: In Vitro Assessment of MR Imaging Safety at 3T
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 661 - 665.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Copyright © 2009 by the American Society of Neuroradiology. Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X