AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gittleman, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, D. S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gittleman, A. M.
Right arrow Articles by Katz, D. S.

BRAIN

Indications for CT in Patients Receiving Anticoagulation after Head Trauma

Adam M. Gittlemana, A. Orlando Ortiza, David P. Keatinga and Douglas S. Katza

a Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, NY

Address reprint requests to Adam M. Gittleman, MD, Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, 259 First Street, Mineola, NY 11501

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Head CT is frequently ordered for trauma patients who are receiving anticoagulation. However, whether patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 15 and normal findings on neurologic examination require CT is still debated. The purpose of our study was to assess the use of cranial CT in patients receiving anticoagulants after head trauma and to establish clinical criteria to identify those in this group who do not need emergency CT.

METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients receiving heparin or coumadin who had head trauma and who subsequently underwent cranial CT at a level I trauma center within a 4-year period. Patients were evaluated for mechanism of injury, clinical signs and symptoms of head injury, and type and reason for anticoagulation. Prothrombin time, international normalized ratio, partial thromboplastin time, GCS score, age, and head CT results were recorded for each patient.

RESULTS: A total of 89 patients fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Among them, 82 had no evidence of intracranial injury on CT. Seven patients had evidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Patients without hemorrhage had no significant focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 14.8. Patients with intracranial hemorrhage tended to have focal neurologic deficits and presented with an average GCS score of 12.0.

CONCLUSION: Patients with head injury, normal GCS scores, and no focal neurologic deficits and who are receiving the anticoagulants heparin or coumadin may not necessarily require emergency CT.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. PsychiatryHome page
A Fabbri, F Servadei, G Marchesini, S C Stein, and A Vandelli
Early predictors of unfavourable outcome in subjects with moderate head injury in the emergency department
J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, May 1, 2008; 79(5): 567 - 573.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]