Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Asao, C. Articles by Yamashita, Y. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Asao, C. Articles by Yamashita, Y.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:1455-1460, June-July 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Radiation-Induced Brain Injury for Differentiation from Tumor Recurrence

Chiaki Asao^a, Yukunori Korogi^c, Mika Kitajima^a,b, Toshinori Hirai^a, Yuji Baba^a, Keishi Makino^b, Masato Kochi^a, Shoji Morishita^a and Yasuyuki Yamashita^a

^a Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
^b Department of Neurosurgery, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan
^c Department of Radiology, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, School of Medicine, 1-1 Iseigaoka, Kitakyushu 807-8555, Japan

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Chiaki Asao, Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1-1 Honjo, Kumamoto 860-8556, Japan (casao{at}krmc.or.jp)

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Differentiation between tumor recurrence and treatment-related brain injury is often difficult with conventional MRI. We hypothesized that the diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) could help differentiate these 2 conditions, because water diffusion may be greater for necrotic tissues in the treatment-related brain injury than for tumor tissues in recurrence. Our aim was to analyze whether DWI findings of recurrent tumor are distinct from those of radiation necrosis.

METHODS: Seventeen patients were examined prospectively. Two readers assessed the images by consensus for homogeneity and signal intensity of the lesions. Five regions of interest were drawn within the lesions on trace DWI images and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps. The minimal, maximal, and mean values of each lesion were compared between the 2 groups. Findings in 12 of 17 patients were verified histologically by surgery or biopsy; the diagnoses in the remaining 5 patients were made on the basis of follow-up MRI findings and clinical follow-up.

RESULTS: There were a total of 20 lesions; 12 lesions were due to radiation necrosis and 8 lesions to tumor recurrence. In the radiation necrosis group, 8 lesions had marked hypointensity. In the recurrence group, however, no marked hypointensity was seen. The maximal ADC values within each lesion were significantly smaller for the recurrence group than for the necrosis group (P = .039).

CONCLUSION: Radiation necrosis usually showed heterogeneity on DWI images and often included spotty, marked hypointensity. Significant difference was found in the maximal ADC values between radiation necrosis and tumor recurrence. DWI was useful in differentiating recurrent neoplasm from radiation necrosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H.S. Seo, K.-H. Chang, D.G. Na, B.J. Kwon, and D.H. Lee High b-Value Diffusion (b = 3000 s/mm2) MR Imaging in Cerebral Gliomas at 3T: Visual and Quantitative Comparisons with b = 1000 s/mm2 AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2008; 29(3): 458 - 463. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Z. Rumboldt, D.L.A. Camacho, D. Lake, C.T. Welsh, and M. Castillo Apparent Diffusion Coefficients for Differentiation of Cerebellar Tumors in Children AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2006; 27(6): 1362 - 1369. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]