Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Dansie, D. M. Articles by Kallmes, D. F. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Dansie, D. M. Articles by Kallmes, D. F.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:1595-1600, June-July 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

SPINE

MRI Findings after Successful Vertebroplasty

David M. Dansie^a, Patrick H. Luetmer^a, John I. Lane^a, Kent R. Thielen^a, John T. Wald^a and David F. Kallmes^a

^a From the Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

Address correspondence to Patrick H. Luetmer, MD, Mayo W-2, 200 1st Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Recurrent or residual back pain after vertebroplasty (VP) is common, and many patients with these symptoms are evaluated by MRI. The purpose of this report is to describe post-treatment MRI findings after successful VP.

METHODS: We identified all patients who underwent VP at our institution and later presented with back pain and had a spine MRI. From these patients, we identified a cohort with uncomplicated procedures, in whom back pain at the site of the VP was not the dominant pain source at follow-up. Using the pre- and postoperative MRIs and the VP conventional radiographs, we assessed such features as interval height loss and changes in marrow edema in treated vertebrae.

RESULTS: Thirty patients (51 treated vertebrae) met our clinical criteria for uncomplicated VP. Nine (18%) of 51 vertebrae lost additional height after the procedure. Neither patient demographics nor variables associated with the procedure itself, including volume of cement injected, correlated with additional height loss after VP. Moderate or severe marrow edema was demonstrated in 62% of vertebrae on preoperative MRI and in 33% of vertebrae on follow-up MRI. Twenty-one percent of vertebrae had new areas of marrow edema on follow-up. Twenty-two percent of vertebrae imaged >6 months after VP had moderate or severe edema.

CONCLUSION: Progressive and persistent edema and interval height loss after successful VP are common and should not be interpreted as sufficient evidence of ongoing pathology at the treated vertebral level.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. E. Rad and D.F. Kallmes Pain Relief following Vertebroplasty in Patients With and Without Localizing Tenderness on Palpation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1622 - 1626. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.H.J. Voormolen, W.J. van Rooij, Y. van der Graaf, P.N.M. Lohle, L.E.H. Lampmann, J.R. Juttmann, and M. Sluzewski Bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty and relation with clinical outcome. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 983 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]