American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:1623-1628, August 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology
SPINE
Prospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes after Percutaneous Vertebroplasty for Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Body Fractures
a From the Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
Address reprint requests to Huy M. Do, Department of Radiology, Section of Neuroradiology, Stanford University Medical Center, 300 Pasteur Drive, Stanford, CA 94305-5105
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Previous studies have retrospectively reported the positive effects of percutaneous vertebroplasty. The purpose of our study was to evaluate prospectively the effects of vertebroplasty on mobility, analgesic use, pain, and SF-36 (short-form 36-item) scales for patients with painful vertebral compression fractures that are refractory to medical therapy.
METHODS: We prospectively followed 167 patients who received 207 vertebroplasty treatment sessions for stabilization of 264 symptomatic vertebral compression fractures between August 1999 and January 2003. The average age of patients was 74.6 years (SD = 12.2 years), and 76% were women. Pre- and postprocedural measurements of pain, mobility, analgesic use, and SF-36 scales were compared at 1 month after the procedure and between 6 months and 3 years after the procedure with the SF-36 scales.
RESULTS: Respective pre- and post-treatment pain scores were 8.71 (SE = 0.1) and 2.77 (SE = 0.18; P < .00001). Respective pre- and post-treatment analgesic use scores were 2.93 (SE = 0.9) and 1.64 (SE = 0.09; P < .00001). Respective pre- and post-treatment activity levels were 2.66 (SE = 0.1) and 1.64 (SE = 0.11; P < .00001). There was a statistically significant improvement on nine of 10 SF-36 scales (P < .001) after 1 month and on eight of 10 SF-36 scales (P < .02) at long-term follow-up.
CONCLUSION: Percutaneous vertebroplasty offers statistically significant benefits in decreasing pain, decreasing use of analgesics, and increasing mobility in appropriately selected patients. Percutaneous vertebroplasty also offers a statistically significant benefit in most SF-36 scales at both short- and long-term follow-up.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Banerjee, M. O. Baerlocher, and M. R. Asch Back stab: Percutaneous vertebroplasty for severe back pain Can Fam Physician, July 1, 2007; 53(7): 1169 - 1175. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
K.F. Layton, K.R. Thielen, C.A. Koch, P.H. Luetmer, J.I. Lane, J.T. Wald, and D.F. Kallmes Vertebroplasty, First 1000 Levels of a Single Center: Evaluation of the Outcomes and Complications AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 683 - 689. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.H.J. Voormolen, W.P.T.M. Mali, P.N.M. Lohle, H. Fransen, L.E.H. Lampmann, Y. van der Graaf, J.R. Juttmann, X. Jansssens, and H.J.J. Verhaar Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Compared with Optimal Pain Medication Treatment: Short-Term Clinical Outcome of Patients with Subacute or Chronic Painful Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures. The VERTOS Study AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 555 - 560. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C.A. Koch, K.F. Layton, and D.F. Kallmes Outcomes of Patients Receiving Long-Term Corticosteroid Therapy Who Undergo Percutaneous Vertebroplasty AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2007; 28(3): 563 - 566. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
A.T. Trout and D.F. Kallmes Does Vertebroplasty Cause Incident Vertebral Fractures? A Review of Available Data AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2006; 27(7): 1397 - 1403. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. A. Manson and F. M. Phillips Minimally Invasive Techniques for the Treatment of Osteoporotic Vertebral Fractures J. Bone Joint Surg. Am., August 1, 2006; 88(8): 1862 - 1872. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M.H.J. Voormolen, W.J. van Rooij, Y. van der Graaf, P.N.M. Lohle, L.E.H. Lampmann, J.R. Juttmann, and M. Sluzewski Bone marrow edema in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous vertebroplasty and relation with clinical outcome. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2006; 27(5): 983 - 988. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||


