Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chen, C. C.-C. Articles by Hung, H.-C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Chen, C. C.-C. Articles by Hung, H.-C.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 26:2349-2356, October 2005
© 2005 American Society of Neuroradiology

INTERVENTIONAL

CT Angiography and MR Angiography in the Evaluation of Carotid Cavernous Sinus Fistula Prior to Embolization: A Comparison of Techniques

Clayton Chi-Chang Chen^a,c,d, Patricia Chuen-Tsuei Chang^b, Cherng-Gueih Shy^e, Wen-Shien Chen^a and Hao-Chun Hung^a

^a Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
^b Department of Ophthalmology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
^c Department of Radiological Technology, Central Taiwan University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
^d Department of Physical Therapy, Hungkuang University, Taichung, Taiwan
^e Department of Radiology, Pingtung Christian Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan

Address correspondence to Clayton Chi-Chang Chen, MD, Department of Radiology, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, 160 Sec. 3, Chung Kung Road, Taichung 407, Taiwan, Republic of China

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study compared CT angiography (CTA), MR angiography (MRA), and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in elucidating the size and location of carotid cavernous sinus fistulas (CCFs) before embolization treatment.

METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 53 patients with angiographically confirmed CCF. All patients underwent pre- and postcontrast-enhanced CTA and DSA, and 50 patients also underwent MRA. Two neuroradiologists rated detectability of the fistula tract as "good," "moderate," or "poor" in source images obtained by using each procedure. The ² test was used to compare the imaging modalities with respect to their ability to detect fistulas.

RESULTS: CTA did not differ significantly from DSA (P = .155), and both CTA (P = .001) and DSA (P = .007) performed significantly better than MRA in the population as a whole. Differences in performance among the methods, however, depended upon the segmental location of the fistula along the internal carotid artery (ICA). CTA and MRA were similar in detection of CCFs in patients with a fistula at segment 3. CTA significantly outperformed MRA in patients with a fistula at segment 4, who accounted for approximately half of the population.

CONCLUSIONS: CTA source imaging has proved itself as useful as DSA for detecting CCFs. Of the 2 noninvasive techniques, CTA performed better than MRA in the population as a whole and in most patients whose fistula was located at segment 4 or 5 of the ICA.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. S. Poon, G. Sze, and M. H. Johnson Orbital Lesions: Differentiating Vascular and Nonvascular Etiologic Factors Am. J. Roentgenol., April 1, 2008; 190(4): 956 - 965. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]