Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Bartlett, E.S. Articles by Fox, A.J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Bartlett, E.S. Articles by Fox, A.J.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:13-19, January 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography

E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons and A.J. Fox

Department of Neuroradiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, Ontario, Canada
Department of Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Address correspondence to Allan J. Fox, MD, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Hospital, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room AG31b, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada

Abstract

PURPOSE: Carotid artery stenosis quantification uses percent diameter ratios from conventional angiography. Multidetector high-speed CT angiography (CTA) allows direct millimeter measurement of carotid stenosis. We hypothesize a linear relationship between millimeter stenosis measurements and derived percent, alleviating cumbersome ratio calculations.

METHODS: Two neuroradiologists separately reviewed CTAs of 268 carotid arteries, blinded to other information. The narrowest portion of each carotid stenosis was measured in millimeters from axial source images. Distal internal carotid arteries (ICAs) were measured beyond the bulb, where walls are parallel. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET)–style ratios were calculated for each ICA, except for suspected near-occlusions. Interobserver agreement was calculated for all measurements. Correlation coefficients were calculated comparing millimeter and derived percent stenosis, followed by regression analysis. Sensitivity and specificity values tested validity.

RESULTS: Interobserver agreement correlations were excellent, from 0.78 to 0.89 (2-tailed P .01). Excellent reader correlation permitted averaging of millimeter stenosis and distal ICA measurements, which were then used to calculate mean percent stenosis. Stenosis assessment was confidently performed from source images even with calcification. Regression analysis of mean percent as a function of mean millimeter stenosis shows a linear relationship, correlating 1.3 mm to 70% and 2.2 mm to 50% NASCET-style stenosis (Pearson’s correlation of –0.95; n = 136). Direct millimeter measurement defining severe stenosis (70% or greater) has sensitivity of 88.2%, specificity of 92.4%, and negative predicted value of 98.2%.

CONCLUSION: There is a linear relationship between millimeter carotid stenosis diameter and derived percent stenosis. This allows prediction of NASCET-type percent from millimeter stenosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Anzidei, A. Napoli, B. C. Marincola, I. Nofroni, D. Geiger, F. Zaccagna, C. Catalano, and R. Passariello Gadofosveset-enhanced MR Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Does Steady-State Imaging Improve Accuracy of First-Pass Imaging? Comparison with Selective Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 457 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				H. C. Schumacher, P. M. Meyers, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, S. D. Lavine, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, P. Rasmussen, and L. R. Wechsler Reporting Standards for Angioplasty and Stent-Assisted Angioplasty for Intracranial Atherosclerosis Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e348 - e365. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A.J. Fox, J. Millar, J. Raymond, J.C. Pryor, D. Roy, G.A. Tomlinson, J.P. McKay, and A.J. Molyneux Dangerous Advances in Measurements from Digital Subtraction Angiography: When Is a Millimeter Not a Millimeter? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2009; 30(3): 459 - 461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Habibi, M.M. Lell, R. Steiner, S.G. Ruehm, J.W. Sayre, K. Nael, and J.P. Finn High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 46 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, R.I. Aviv, and A.J. Fox Classification of Carotid Stenosis by Millimeter CT Angiography Measures: Effects of Prevalence and Gender AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1677 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Tsutsumi, H. Aikawa, M. Onizuka, M. Iko, T. Kodama, K. Nii, S. Hamaguchi, H. Etou, K. Sakamoto, and K. Kazekawa Carotid Artery Stenting for Calcified Lesions AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1590 - 1593. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Response to Letter by Bladin et al Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e102 - e102. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M.M. Lell, H. Ditt, C. Panknin, J.W. Sayre, S.G. Ruehm, E. Klotz, B.F. Tomandl, and J.P. Villablanca Bone-Subtraction CT Angiography: Evaluation of Two Different Fully Automated Image-Registration Procedures for Interscan Motion Compensation AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2007; 28(7): 1362 - 1368. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, F. J. Ahlhelm, E. S. Bartlett, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Simplification of the residual lumen geometry in measuring carodid stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 804 - 804. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. Lell, C. Fellner, U. Baum, T. Hothorn, R. Steiner, W. Lang, W. Bautz, and F.A. Fellner Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis with Multisection CT and MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Modality and Postprocessing AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2007; 28(1): 104 - 110. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. M. Lell, K. Anders, M. Uder, E. Klotz, H. Ditt, F. Vega-Higuera, T. Boskamp, W. A. Bautz, and B. F. Tomandl New Techniques in CT Angiography RadioGraphics, October 1, 2006; 26(suppl_1): S45 - S62. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. P. Friedman Quantification of Carotid Stenosis on CT Angiography-- Does Gender Matter? AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1601 - 1601. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Reply: AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2006; 27(8): 1601 - 1601. [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 632 - 637. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E.S. Bartlett, S.P. Symons, and A.J. Fox Correlation of Carotid Stenosis Diameter and Cross-Sectional Areas with CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., March 1, 2006; 27(3): 638 - 642. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]