AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nael, K.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J.P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Nael, K.
Right arrow Articles by Finn, J.P.

Technical Note
BRAIN

Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography at 3T in the Evaluation of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparison with Time-of-Flight MR Angiography

K. Naela, J.P. Villablancaa, R. Saleha, W. Popea, A. Naela, G. Laubb and J.P. Finna

a Department of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif
b Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany

Please address correspondence to: Kambiz Nael, MD, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 10945 Le Conte Ave, Ste 3371, Los Angeles, CA 90095-7206; e-mail: nkambiz{at}mednet.ucla.edu

SUMMARY: The combination of 3T and parallel-acquisition techniques holds promise for improved performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (MRA), in terms of speed, spatial resolution, and coverage. We present a comparison of 2 MRA techniques, including time-of-flight (TOF) and contrast-enhanced MRA, for detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms. Our results show that contrast-enhanced MRA with highly accelerated parallel acquisition at 3T does not have the known drawbacks of TOF-MRA techniques, including prolonged acquisition time, spin saturation, and flow-related artifacts, with comparable aneurysm characterization.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
N. Anzalone, F. Scomazzoni, M. Cirillo, C. Righi, F. Simionato, M. Cadioli, A. Iadanza, M.A. Kirchin, and G. Scotti
Follow-Up of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1530 - 1536.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
R.S. Saleh, D.G. Lohan, J.P. Villablanca, G. Duckwiler, S.T. Kee, and J.P. Finn
Assessment of Craniospinal Arteriovenous Malformations at 3T with Highly Temporally and Highly Spatially Resolved Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2008; 29(5): 1024 - 1031.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Am. J. Roentgenol.Home page
D. G. Lohan, F. Barkhordarian, R. Saleh, M. Krishnam, N. Salamon, S. G. Ruehm, and J. P. Finn
MR Angiography at 3 T for Assessment of the External Carotid Artery System
Am. J. Roentgenol., November 1, 2007; 189(5): 1088 - 1094.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]