American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:440-446, February 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Distribution Characteristics, Reproducibility, and Precision of Region of InterestBased Hippocampal Diffusion Tensor Imaging Measures
a Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Germany
b Institute of Neuroradiology, University of Mainz, Germany
Address correspondence to Matthias J. Müller, MD, Department of Psychiatry, University of Mainz, Untere Zahlbacher Str. 8, D-55131 Mainz, Germany
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: For adequate interpretation of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) parameters empirical distribution characteristics, precision, and reproducibility should be known. The present study investigated distribution and reliability parameters of hippocampal fractional anisotropy (FA) and mean diffusivity (MD).
METHODS: FA and MD values were averaged in hippocampal regions of interest in 20 subjects (10 women and 10 men; age range, 2569 years). Regions of interest were manually placed bilaterally by one investigator at 2 occasions, and by a second independent investigator. Sample distributions of FA and MD values were compared with normal distributions. Intraclass coefficients (ICCs), standard errors of measurement (SEMs), and coefficients of variation (CVs) with confidence intervals (CI95s) were computed.
RESULTS: The results did not show any deviation of averaged FA (0.237 ± 0.017) and MD (775 ± 28 µm2/s) values from normal distribution. Intraobserver reliability (ICC
0.90) and precision (CV
3.5%) were high for all measures. Interobserver reliability reached values of ICC
0.84 and CV
4.1%. FA yielded lower precision (CV 2.24.1%) than MD (CV 1.32.5%), CI95s were around ±0.0150.020 and ±2530 µm2/s for FA and MD, respectively. FA differences of 0.0200.030 and MD differences of 4050 µm2/s can be assumed to reflect reliably distinct values in hippocampal regions.
CONCLUSION: The results are in line with previous reports on reliability of DTI measures by using different designs and methodology. Notwithstanding the difficulties associated with region of interestderived DTI measurements in hippocampal regions, the present approach provides estimates of distribution characteristics and precision applicable to routine assessments of DTI parameters in clinical and research context.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
G. Andreisek, L. M. White, A. Kassner, and M. S. Sussman Evaluation of Diffusion Tensor Imaging and Fiber Tractography of the Median Nerve: Preliminary Results on Intrasubject Variability and Precision of Measurements Am. J. Roentgenol., January 1, 2010; 194(1): W65 - W72. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Bisdas, D.E. Bohning, N. Besenski, J.S. Nicholas, and Z. Rumboldt Reproducibility, Interrater Agreement, and Age-Related Changes of Fractional Anisotropy Measures at 3T in Healthy Subjects: Effect of the Applied b-Value AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2008; 29(6): 1128 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S.K. Schimrigk, B. Bellenberg, M. Schluter, B. Stieltjes, R. Drescher, J. Rexilius, C. Lukas, H.K. Hahn, H. Przuntek, and O. Koster Diffusion Tensor Imaging-Based Fractional Anisotropy Quantification in the Corticospinal Tract of Patients with Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Using a Probabilistic Mixture Model AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2007; 28(4): 724 - 730. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||

