Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Wippold, F.J. Articles by Perry, A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Wippold, F.J., II Articles by Perry, A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:488-492, March 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

Pathology Review

Neuropathology for the Neuroradiologist: Rosettes and Pseudorosettes

F.J. Wippold, II^a,c,d and A. Perry^b

^a Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, St. Louis, Mo
^b Neuropathology Division, Department of Pathology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Mo
^c Department of Radiology, Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, Mo
^d Department of Radiology/Nuclear Medicine, F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, Md

Address correspondence to Franz J. Wippold II, MD, Neuroradiology Section, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University Medical Center, 510 South Kingshighway Blvd, St. Louis, MO 63110

SUMMARY: The neuropathologic diagnosis of brain tumors entails the microscopic examination of conventional formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue samples surgically removed from a radiographically defined lesion. A preliminary diagnosis is often rendered with frozen sections, though the final or definitive diagnosis usually requires more elaborate studies. Typically, the tissue is first fixed for a minimum of several hours in 10% neutral buffered formalin, processed through a series of dehydrating and clearing reagents, and embedded in a hardening wax, such as paraffin. The latter enables the tissue to be thinly sliced with a microtome, transferred to a glass slide, and then stained with dyes such as hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) that contrast the different cellular elements. Pathologists rely on visual clues such as pattern recognition when examining the stained tissue with a microscope, much as radiologists rely on gray-scale patterns of densities and intensities on images. Some histologic patterns of cellular architecture are distinctive if not pathognomonic, whereas others are less specific, but nevertheless considerably narrow the differential diagnosis. The precise biologic bases for some of the observed microscopic patterns are poorly understood, though their recognition remains useful nonetheless. Although more advanced methods of tissue examination—such as histochemical and immunohistochemical profiling, genetic analysis, and electron microscopy—have been developed, the microscopic review of H&E–stained material remains a critical component of tumor diagnosis.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				H. Dimaras, V. Khetan, W. Halliday, M. Orlic, N. L. Prigoda, B. Piovesan, P. Marrano, T. W. Corson, R. C. Eagle Jr, J. A. Squire, et al. Loss of RB1 induces non-proliferative retinoma: increasing genomic instability correlates with progression to retinoblastoma Hum. Mol. Genet., May 15, 2008; 17(10): 1363 - 1372. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]