American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:632-637, March 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Diagnosing Carotid Stenosis Near-Occlusion by Using CT Angiography
a Department of Neuroradiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Ill
b Department of Medicine, Hospital for Sick Children, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
c Department of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Address correspondence to Allan J. Fox, MD, Department of Neuroradiology, Sunnybrook and Women’s College Heath Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, 2075 Bayview Ave, Room AG31b, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Identification of carotid near-occlusion is essential before calculation of percent stenosis because stroke risk is lower than other severe stenosis and the treatment benefit is less. Calculations with reduced distal diameters are fallacious. CT angiography (CTA) is convenient and accurately quantifies internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis.
METHODS: In a blinded protocol, 268 carotid artery CTAs for known or suspected carotid disease were independently evaluated by 2 neuroradiologists. All carotid arteries were measured in millimeters at the narrowest diameter of the stenotic bulb, distal ICA well beyond the tapering bulb, and distal external carotid artery (ECA). Near-occlusions were independently identified, with disagreements settled by consensus meeting. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis defined the threshold values that best predicted near-occlusion according to (1) ICA stenosis, (2) distal ICA, (3) distal ICA: contralateral distal ICA, and (4) distal ICA: ECA. Paired permutations of variables were evaluated.
RESULTS: Forty-two near-occlusion distal ICAs were identified. The ROC-derived threshold values determined near-occlusion carotid stenosis with a sensitivity range, 90.2–97.3; specificity, 84.1–89.9; positive predictive value (PPV), 61.3–66.7; and negative predictive value (NPV), 96.7–99.4. Ranges for paired permutations were also determined: sensitivity, 82.9–91.9; specificity, 95.4–96.8; PPV, 78.6–85.7; and NPV, 96.3–98.4.
CONCLUSIONS: Threshold values provide guidelines for CTA interpretation when assessing carotid artery disease and the presence of near-occlusion. Ultimate identification of near-occlusion requires the interpreter’s judgment, with attention to the following criteria: (1) notable stenosis of the ICA bulb and (2) distal ICA caliber reduction compared with (A) expected size, (B) contralateral ICA, and (C) ipsilateral ECA. Near-occlusion distal ICAs can be reliably identified on CTA.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, E. S. Bartlett, M. Anzidei, A. Napoli, C. Catalano, and R. Passariello Falsely Claiming Use of NASCET Percentage Stenosis Method Radiology, November 1, 2009; 253(2): 574 - 575. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 A. J. Fox, S. P. Symons, R. I. Aviv, P. Howard, R. Yeung, and E. S. Bartlett Should Modeling Methodology Suppress Anatomic Excellence? Stroke, November 1, 2009; 40(11): 3411 - 3412. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
 |
|
 L. Saba and G. Mallarin Window Settings for the Study of Calcified Carotid Plaques with Multidetector CT Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., August 1, 2009; 30(7): 1445 - 1450. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E.S. Bartlett, T.D. Walters, S.P. Symons, R.I. Aviv, and A.J. Fox Classification of Carotid Stenosis by Millimeter CT Angiography Measures: Effects of Prevalence and Gender AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1677 - 1683. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Response to Letter by Bladin et al Stroke, October 1, 2007; 38(10): e102 - e102. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
G. Schulte-Altedorneburg, F. J. Ahlhelm, E. S. Bartlett, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Simplification of the residual lumen geometry in measuring carodid stenosis. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., May 1, 2007; 28(5): 804 - 804. [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|
|
|
|
|
E. S. Bartlett, T. D. Walters, S. P. Symons, and A. J. Fox Carotid Stenosis Index Revisited With Direct CT Angiography Measurement of Carotid Arteries to Quantify Carotid Stenosis Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 286 - 291. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|