Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Pierot, L. Articles by Gallas, S. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Pierot, L. Articles by Gallas, S.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:744-749, April 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

INTERVENTIONAL

Follow-Up of Intracranial Aneurysms Selectively Treated with Coils: Prospective Evaluation of Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography

L. Pierot^a, C. Delcourt^a, F. Bouquigny^a, D. Breidt^a, B. Feuillet^a, O. Lanoix^a and S. Gallas^a

^a From the Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Maison-Blanche, Reims cedex, France

Address correspondence to Laurent Pierot, MD, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Maison-Blanche, 45, rue Cognacq-Jay, 51092 eims cedex, France

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility and usefulness of contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE-MRA) for the follow-up of intracranial aneurysms treated with detachable coils, by comparing CE-MRA with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and 3D time-of- flight (TOF) MRA.

METHODS: Thirty-two patients with 42 treated aneurysms were included in the study; 6 had been treated for multiple aneurysms. All MRAs were performed with a 1.5T unit within 48 hours of DSA. We performed 2 types of acquisition: a 3D TOF sequence and CE-MRA. Twenty-eight patients were included 1 year after endovascular treatment, and 4 patients, after 3 years or more. DSA was the technique of reference for the detection of a residual neck or residual aneurysm.

RESULTS: Compared with DSA, the sensitivity of MRA was good. For the detection of residual neck, there was no significant difference between the results of 3D TOF MRA (sensitivity, 75%–87.5%; specificity, 92.9%, according to both readers) and CE-MRA (sensitivity, 75%–82.1%; specificity, 85.7%–92.9%). For the detection of residual aneurysm, sensitivity and specificity of both techniques were the same, respectively 80%–100% and 97.3%–100%. Therefore, CE-MRA was not better than 3D TOF MRA for the detection of residual neck or residual aneurysm. For large treated aneurysms, there was no difference between decisions regarding further therapy after CE and 3D TOF MRA, even though CE-MRA with a short echotime and enhancement gave fewer artifacts and better visualization of recanalization than 3D TOF MRA. The interpretation of transverse source images and the detection of coil mesh packing seemed easier with 3D TOF imaging.

CONCLUSION: This prospective study did not show that CE-MRA was significantly better than 3D TOF MRA for depicting aneurysm or neck remnants after selective endovascular treatment using coils. For aneurysms treated with coils, 3D TOF MRA seems a valid and useful technique for the follow-up of coiled aneurysms.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				P. M. Meyers, H. C. Schumacher, R. T. Higashida, C. P. Derdeyn, G. M. Nesbit, D. Sacks, L. R. Wechsler, J. B. Bederson, S. D. Lavine, and P. Rasmussen Reporting Standards for Endovascular Repair of Saccular Intracranial Cerebral Aneurysms Stroke, May 1, 2009; 40(5): e366 - e379. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Agid, R.A. Willinsky, S.-K. Lee, K.G. TerBrugge, and R.I. Farb Characterization of Aneurysm Remnants after Endovascular Treatment: Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography versus Catheter Digital Subtraction Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1570 - 1574. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				N. Anzalone, F. Scomazzoni, M. Cirillo, C. Righi, F. Simionato, M. Cadioli, A. Iadanza, M.A. Kirchin, and G. Scotti Follow-Up of Coiled Cerebral Aneurysms at 3T: Comparison of 3D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography and Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., September 1, 2008; 29(8): 1530 - 1536. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.C. Wallace, J.P. Karis, S. Partovi, and D. Fiorella Noninvasive Imaging of Treated Cerebral Aneurysms, Part I: MR Angiographic Follow-Up of Coiled Aneurysms AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1001 - 1008. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. L. DeLaPaz and for the Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging Cerebrovascular Disease AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., June 1, 2007; 28(6): 1197 - 1199. [Full Text] [PDF]

				D. M. Pelz, E. I. Levy, and L. N. Hopkins Advances in Interventional Neuroradiology 2006 Stroke, February 1, 2007; 38(2): 232 - 234. [Full Text] [PDF]