Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by King, A.D. Articles by Ahuja, A.T. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by King, A.D. Articles by Ahuja, A.T.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:1288-1291, June-July 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

HEAD AND NECK

Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

A.D. King^a, A.C. Vlantis^b, R.K.Y. Tsang^b, T.M.K. Gary^c, A.K.Y. Au^a, C.Y. Chan^a, S.Y. Kok^a, W.T. Kwok^a, H.K. Lui^a and A.T. Ahuja^a

^a Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
^b Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China
^c Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong, China

Address correspondence to Dr. A.D. King, Department of Diagnostic Radiology and Organ Imaging, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, New Territories, Hong Kong S.A.R. China

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic guided biopsy (EGB) is performed after an initial endoscopy for the investigation of patients with suspected nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). The aim of the study was to determine whether MR imaging has the potential to replace invasive EGB in patients with a normal endoscopy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS: Data from 2 groups of patients was reviewed, group 1 with proved NPC for MR staging (n = 456) and group 2 with suspected NPC (n = 77). The sensitivity was calculated for group 1 and sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy for group 2.

RESULTS: In group 1, which included 118 of 456 (26%) with stage 1 disease, cancer was detected in all patients, giving a sensitivity of 100%. In group 2, MR imaging was negative for NPC in 70 (91%) patients, and no cancer has been detected on follow-up (follow-up range, 1–90 months; mean, 36 months). MR imaging was positive for NPC in 7 (9%) patients and NPC was confirmed by biopsy in 3 (4%). Two of these 3 patients had undergone negative endoscopy and biopsy before the MR imaging. NPC was not present in the remaining 4 patients, 2 of whom were found to have lymphoid hyperplasia. MR imaging had a sensitivity of 100%, specificity of 95%, NPV of 100%, PPV of 43%, and accuracy of 95%.

CONCLUSION: MR imaging has the potential to screen healthy patients who do not require EGB and direct the site of biopsy in small cancers that may be missed by endoscopy. On the basis of these results, a prospective study is planned.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A Siddiqui and S E J Connor Imaging of the pharynx and larynx Imaging, March 1, 2007; 19(1): 83 - 103. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]