Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Spilt, A. Articles by van Buchem, M.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Spilt, A. Articles by van Buchem, M.A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 27:1964-1968, October 2006
© 2006 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Not All Age-Related White Matter Hyperintensities Are the Same: A Magnetization Transfer Imaging Study

A. Spilt^a, R. Goekoop^c, R.G.J. Westendorp^b, G.J. Blauw^b, A.J.M. de Craen^b and M.A. van Buchem^a

^a Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
^b Department of General Internal Medicine, Section of Gerontology and Geriatrics, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
^c Department of Neurology, Alzheimer Center, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Please address correspondence to A. Spilt, MD, Department of Radiology, C2S, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA Leiden, the Netherlands; e-mail: a.spilt{at}lumc.nl

PURPOSE: Our aim was to assess whether presumed histologic heterogeneity of age-related white matter hyperintensities (WMH) is reflected in quantitative magnetization transfer imaging measures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: From a group of patients participating in a double-blind placebo-controlled multicenter study on the effect of pravastatin (PROSPER), we selected 56 subjects with WMH. WMH were classified as periventricular WMH (PVWMH) and deep WMH (DWMH). PVWMH were subclassified as irregular or smooth, depending on the aspect of their border. Signal intensity of WMH on T1-weighted images was scored as iso- or hypointense. The mean magnetization transfer ratio (MTR) value of different types of WMH was assessed and compared. As a control group, we selected 19 subjects with no or limited WMH.

RESULTS: Mean (SE) MTR of PVWMH (frontal, 31.2% [0.2%]; occipital, 32.2% [0.2%]) was lower than that of DWMH (33.7% [0.5%]). The mean MTR of frontal PVWMH (31.2% [0.2%]) was lower than that of occipital PVWMH (32.2% [0.2%]). Compared with occipital PVWMH, frontal PVWMH more often had a smooth lining (72% frontal versus 8% occipital) and an area with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images (76% frontal versus 35% occipital). MTR did not differ between smooth (31.1% [0.3%]) and irregular (31.6% [0.5%]) PVWMH.

CONCLUSION: Age-related WMH are heterogeneous, despite their similar appearance on T2-weighted images. By taking into account heterogeneity of age-related WMH, both in terms of etiology and in terms of severity of tissue destruction, one may obtain better understanding on the causes and consequences of these lesions.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				C. M. Holland, E. E. Smith, I. Csapo, M. E. Gurol, D. A. Brylka, R. J. Killiany, D. Blacker, M. S. Albert, C. R.G. Guttmann, and S. M. Greenberg Spatial Distribution of White-Matter Hyperintensities in Alzheimer Disease, Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy, and Healthy Aging Stroke, April 1, 2008; 39(4): 1127 - 1133. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]