Advanced

AJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via CrossRef Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Lell, M. Articles by Fellner, F.A. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Lell, M. Articles by Fellner, F.A.

American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:104-110, January 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology

BRAIN

Evaluation of Carotid Artery Stenosis with Multisection CT and MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Modality and Postprocessing

M. Lell^a, C. Fellner^d, U. Baum^a, T. Hothorn^b, R. Steiner^a, W. Lang^c, W. Bautz^a and F.A. Fellner^e

^a Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
^b Departments of Medical Informatics, Biometry, and Epidemiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
^c Vascular Surgery, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
^d Institute of Radiology, Landes-Nervenklinik Wagner Jauregg, Linz, Austria
^e Institute of Radiology, AKh Linz, Linz, Austria

Address correspondence to Michael Lell, MD, Institute of Diagnostic Radiology, University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; e-mail: michael.lell{at}idr.imed.uni-erlangen.de

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We prospectively evaluated the influence of different imaging techniques (time-of-flight MR angiography [TOF-MRA], contrast-enhanced MR angiography [CE-MRA], multisection CT angiography [CTA]) and postprocessing methods (maximum intensity projection [MIP], multiplanar reformation [MPR]) on carotid artery stenosis grading.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty patients (34 men, 16 women) with symptomatic stenosis of the internal carotid artery were examined with a 16-section spiral CT and a 1.5T MR unit. Two MRA techniques were applied: 3D-TOF and CE-MRA. MPR was used for postprocessing with all modalities; MIP was used only with MRA. Four readers measured and calculated the percentage diameter stenosis independently according to NASCET criteria. The Wilcoxon test was used to measure interobserver variability, and the Friedman test was used to test the null-hypothesis of equality of the modalities.

RESULTS: The hypothesis for global equality was rejected (P < .001). TOF-MRA and CTA assessed with MPR showed the highest concordance (difference, 0.6%; confidence interval [CI], –3.0, 4.3%), and CE-MRA with MIP and CTA showed the lowest concordance in stenosis grading (difference, 7.0%; CI, 3.4, 10.6%). MPR resulted in lower degrees of stenosis than MIP for both MRA sequences, although not statistically significant (CE, –3.0%; CI, –6.6, 0.6%; TOF, –2.2%; CI, –5.8, 1.4%). When only studies with good or excellent image quality were considered, the differences decreased, but the trends remained.

CONCLUSION: Stenosis grading is dependent on the examination method and postprocessing technique. CTA and TOF-MRA evaluated with MPR revealed highest concordance.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. Anzidei, A. Napoli, B. C. Marincola, I. Nofroni, D. Geiger, F. Zaccagna, C. Catalano, and R. Passariello Gadofosveset-enhanced MR Angiography of Carotid Arteries: Does Steady-State Imaging Improve Accuracy of First-Pass Imaging? Comparison with Selective Digital Subtraction Angiography Radiology, May 1, 2009; 251(2): 457 - 466. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				L.S. Babiarz, J.M. Romero, E.K. Murphy, B. Brobeck, P.W. Schaefer, R.G. Gonzalez, and M.H. Lev Contrast-Enhanced MR Angiography Is Not More Accurate Than Unenhanced 2D Time-of-Flight MR Angiography for Determining >=70% Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2009; 30(4): 761 - 768. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. Habibi, M.M. Lell, R. Steiner, S.G. Ruehm, J.W. Sayre, K. Nael, and J.P. Finn High-Resolution 3T MR Angiography of the Carotid Arteries: Comparison of Manual and Semiautomated Quantification of Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., January 1, 2009; 30(1): 46 - 52. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R.P. Lim, M. Shapiro, E.Y. Wang, M. Law, J.S. Babb, L.E. Rueff, J.S. Jacob, S. Kim, R.H. Carson, T.P. Mulholland, et al. 3D Time-Resolved MR Angiography (MRA) of the Carotid Arteries with Time-Resolved Imaging with Stochastic Trajectories: Comparison with 3D Contrast-Enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D Time-Of-Flight MRA AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2008; 29(10): 1847 - 1854. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Runck, R.P. Steiner, W.A. Bautz, and M.M. Lell MR Imaging: Influence of Imaging Technique and Postprocessing on Measurement of Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., October 1, 2008; 29(9): 1736 - 1742. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]