AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Strub, W.M.
Right arrow Articles by Bulas, R.V.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Strub, W.M.
Right arrow Articles by Bulas, R.V.

SPINE

Sacroplasty by CT and Fluoroscopic Guidance: Is the Procedure Right for Your Patient?

W.M. Struba, M. Hoffmannb, R.J. Ernstb and R.V. Bulasb

a Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio
b Department of Radiology, The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio

Address correspondence to William M. Strub, MD, Department of Radiology, University of Cincinnati, 234 Goodman St, ML 0761, Cincinnati, OH 45267; e-mail: williamstrub{at}hotmail.com

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Sacral insufficiency fractures are an infrequent but often disabling cause of severe low back pain. We report our results of a sacroplasty technique, using CT for needle placement and fluoroscopy to monitor the polymethylmethacrylate injection in a group of patients with sacral insufficiency fractures.

METHODS: All patients had a history of chronic back pain and had an osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fracture documented by imaging before the procedure. With the patient under conscious sedation, a bone biopsy needle was placed under CT guidance; the patient was then transferred to the fluoroscopy suite, where a polymethylmethacrylate mixture was injected into the sacrum under real-time fluoroscopy. Clinical outcome was assessed by telephone.

RESULTS: The procedure was performed on 13 female patients with an average age of 76 years (range, 60–88 years). A bilateral procedure was performed in 11 patients and a unilateral procedure was performed in 2 patients. An average of 4.1 mL of cement was injected for each treatment. There were no instances of cement extravasation into the central canal or sacral foramina. Long-term follow-up, averaging 15 months, was available in 6 patients. Five patients (83%) reported no symptoms of pain at all. The final patient, in whom a bilateral procedure was performed, was completely asymptomatic on the left side but reported persistent unilateral pain on the right.

CONCLUSION: Sacroplasty is a safe and effective procedure in the treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures that can provide substantial pain relief and lead to a better quality of life.