AJDRAJNR - American Journal of Neuroradiology

This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via CrossRef
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Benedetti, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gonen, O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Benedetti, B.
Right arrow Articles by Gonen, O.

BRAIN

Reproducibility of the Whole-Brain N-Acetylaspartate Level across Institutions, MR Scanners, and Field Strengths

B. Benedettia,b, D.J. Rigottia, S. Liua, M. Filippib, R.I. Grossmana and O. Gonena

a Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
b Neuroimaging Research Unit, Department of Neurology, Scientific Institute and University, San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy

Address correspondence to Oded Gonen, PhD, Department of Radiology, New York University School of Medicine, 650 First Ave, 6th Floor, New York, NY 10016; e-mail: oded.gonen{at}med.nyu.edu

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Radiologic markers in multicenter trials are often confounded by different instrumentation used. Our goal was to estimate the variance of the global concentration of the neuronal cell marker N-acetylaspartate (NAA) among research centers using MR imaging scanners of different models, from different manufacturers, and of different magnetic field strength.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Absolute millimolar amounts of whole-brain NAA (WBNAA) were quantified with nonlocalizing proton MR spectroscopy in the brains of 101 healthy subjects (53 women, 48 men) aged 16–59 years (mean, 34.2 years). Twenty-three were scanned at 1 institute in a 1.5T Siemens Vision; 31 from another institute were studied with a 1.5T Siemens SP63; 36 were scanned at a third institute (24 with a 1.5T Vision, 12 with a 3T Siemens Trio); and 11 were obtained at a fourth institute using a 4T GE Signa 5.x. The NAA amounts were quantified with phantom-replacement and divided by the brain volume, segmented from MR imaging, to yield the concentration, a metric independent of brain size suitable for cross-sectional comparison.

RESULTS: The average WBNAA concentration among institutions was 12.2 ± 1.2 mmol/L. The subjects’ WBNAA distributions did not differ significantly (p > .237) among the 4 centers, regardless of scanner manufacturer, model, or field strength and irrespective of whether adjustments were made for age or sex.

CONCLUSION: Absolute quantification against a standard makes the WBNAA concentration insensitive to the MR hardware used to acquire it. This important attribute renders it a robust surrogate marker for multicenter neurologic trials.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Am. J. Neuroradiol.Home page
D.J. Rigotti, M. Inglese, and O. Gonen
Whole-Brain N-Acetylaspartate as a Surrogate Marker of Neuronal Damage in Diffuse Neurologic Disorders
AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., November 1, 2007; 28(10): 1843 - 1849.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]