doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A0688
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
American Journal of Neuroradiology 28:1981-1987, November-December 2007
© 2007 American Society of Neuroradiology
BRAIN
Role of Perfusion CT in Glioma Grading and Comparison with Conventional MR Imaging Features
a Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich
b Departments of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich
c Departments of Biostatistics and Research Epidemiology, Henry Ford Health System, Detroit, Mich
Please address correspondence to: Rajan Jain, MD, Division of Neuroradiology, Department of Radiology, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Blvd, Detroit MI 48202; e-mail rajanj{at}rad.hfh.edu
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Perfusion imaging using CT can provide additional information about tumor vascularity and angiogenesis for characterizing gliomas. The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the usefulness of various perfusion CT (PCT) parameters in assessing the grade of treatment-naïve gliomas and also to compare it with conventional MR imaging features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: PCT was performed in 19 patients with glioma (14 high-grade gliomas and 5 low-grade gliomas). Normalized ratios of the PCT parameters (normalized cerebral blood volume [nCBV], normalized cerebral blood flow [nCBF], normalized mean transit time [nMTT]) were used for final analysis. Conventional MR imaging features of these tumors were assessed separately and compared with PCT parameters. Low- and high-grade gliomas were compared by using the nonparametric Wilcoxon 2-sample tests.
RESULTS: Mean nCBV in the high- and low-grade gliomas was 3.06 ± 1.35 and 1.44 ± 0.42, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .005). Mean nCBF for the high- and low-grade gliomas was 3.03 ± 2.16 and 1.16 ± 0.36, respectively, with a statistically significant difference between the 2 groups (P = .045). Cut points of >1.92 for nCBV (85.7% sensitivity and 100% specificity), >1.48 for nCBF (71.4% sensitivity and 100% specificity), and <1.94 for nMTT (92.9% sensitivity and 40% specificity) were found to identify the high-grade gliomas. nCBV was the single best parameter; however, using either nCBV of >1.92 or nCBF of >1.48 improved the sensitivity and specificity to 92.9% and 100%, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity for diagnosing a high-grade glioma with conventional MR imaging were 85.7% and 60%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PCT can be used for preoperative grading of gliomas and can provide valuable complementary information about tumor hemodynamics, not available with conventional imaging techniques. nCBV was the single best parameter correlating with glioma grades, though using nCBF when nCBV was <1.92 improved the sensitivity. An nCBV threshold of >1.92 was found to identify the high-grade gliomas.
This article has been cited by other articles:
 |
|
 |
|
  R. Jain, S.K. Ellika, L. Scarpace, L.R. Schultz, J.P. Rock, J. Gutierrez, S.C. Patel, J. Ewing, and T. Mikkelsen Quantitative Estimation of Permeability Surface-Area Product in Astroglial Brain Tumors Using Perfusion CT and Correlation with Histopathologic Grade AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol., April 1, 2008; 29(4): 694 - 700. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]
|
|